Exactly! These judges are legislating from the bench!
Under traditional marriage law, all men and all women are treated exactly the same under those laws. There is no violation of equal protection of the laws, by defining marriage as 1 man and 1 woman. Yet liberal judges have twisted things, because homosexuals want to marry a same sex partner.
What nobody is saying, however, is that the number 2 is also discriminatory, if it’s discriminatory to say that marriage is limited to opposite sex couples.
:: What nobody is saying, however, is that the number 2 is also discriminatory ::
Now that “equal protection” is the sole measure of discrimmination...
It is also “discrimminatory” to deny a brother from marrying his sister, as long as they are happy.
It is “discrimminatory” to deny a 50 year-old man to marry a 12 year-old girl as long as they are happy.
It is “discrimminatory” to deny an adult woman’s wish to marry her horse as long as they are happy.
And you know that when the Supreme Court strikes down obamacare, the liberals will be yelling about legislating from the bench