So, this article is pointing out that a fairly long-held scientific view (hardly “dogma,” as the writer puts it) is being disproved by a growing mass of new information. And so?? It happens frequently.
But that's kind of the point. People who do not buy into the concept of macro-evolution and typically brushed aside: "Bug off! I'm a scientist! Who are you???"
But then things change, and the scientist who was so sure of himself is found to be wrong, and now has a new conclusion, which is once again unassailable: "That's how science is done! Now we know more! This time the science is settled! Bug off!"
It's not science. It's scientism.
but we creationist have been telling ‘science so-called’ for years, they were wrong and we were right...that is why it is being pointed out....