Posted on 05/30/2012 7:16:29 AM PDT by Kaslin
Yeah
Actually Wilson and LBJ were far far worse. However if we give this guy a 2nd term he may yet surpass them.
No matter who wins, there will be a democrat in the white house in 2013.
The biggest mistake anyone can make is to sit home and not vote because someone makes a prediction. The only way to make sure the prediction comes true is to vote
Homos.
The money quote.
*******************
Pick one...
Just one...
Any one...
More than one if you prefer...
************
“Either is death for America”
True, but one is quick, sudden and painful. And irreversible.
The other is slow and tortuous, but might be put into remission, or even reveresed and cured, eventually.
Neither is a pleasant choice, but there is no other. One of these two will be President. But I’d like to see Sarah Palin as President, or Thomas Sowell, or Walter Williams. Or, if he wasn’t so valuable on the Supreme court, the magnificent Clarence Thomas.
He left out the Stalin factor.
It's not who votes that counts. It's who counts the votes.
A socialist foreign interest is counting our votes. Not good for the USA.
Don’t forget Gunny Sgt. R. Lee Ermey or Lt. Col. Allen West for possible POTUS and/or VPOTUS picks!
“*Small Business owners. Because I ran for Vice President last time around, and I’m a small businessman myself, I know literally thousands of small business owners. At least 40% of them in my circle of friends, fans and supporters voted for Obama 4 years ago to ‘give someone different a chance.’
In my circle of small businessmen friends, I was one of the few who didn’t say, “give someone different a chance.” I was very disappointed, four years ago, when a dear friend of mine, fairly conservative owner of multiple small businesses over the years, came out angrily against McCain and indicated his intention to vote for the anti-Christ.
Here we are four years later and he can’t wait to vote against the Kenyan.
Similarly with devout Catholics. Four years ago, many of my church-going Catholic friends were willing to “give someone different a chance.” This year, most of the folks I know are angry at the Kenyan anti-Christ and can’t wait to go vote against him.
It will be a difficult election for the scum currently occupying the White House. Let’s hope it’s as difficult as this writer makes out.
Thinking about it now could you imagine if West and Ermey were POTUS and VeP? Think of the press conferences they would have. If one of the press got out of line it would be great to see West use style and grace to cut them down to size. Then have an immediate follow up by Ermey to shred them with that D.I. mouth and persona of his in front of everyone and then kick their buttocks out of the conference. Or give them the option to drop and give him 50 pushups! LOL!
It would be an absolute riot. The ratings would go through the freaking roof!!!
Or have see them revoke all of the press credentials of the Leftist journos and only allow conservative, freedom and liberty-loving reporters in!
The good news is that this is a wash and all the other voter blocs mentioned will be moving away from Obama this time around as the author says. I'm on board with the landslide but will try not to be over-confident.
Except 4 years later, they know there are no jerbs. 46% unemployed in their chosen field two years after graduation. And what is Bobo's opponent talking about every time his mug is onscreen? Jerbs.
We'll be here to dry their tears -- with sand -- on Nov. 7.
He didn’t mention what conservative voters will do. I wonder why? /s
It was June of 1992 when I went to a Perot rally on Boston Common. It was pandemonium. About 20,000 people turned out on a day's notice.
Like you, I wonder if Perot had an "oh crap" moment when he realized he was actually on the way to winning the election outright. That's probably not what Perot had in mind at all so he turned on the "crazy uncle" bit in order to throw the election to Clinton (which is what he evidently wanted to do all along). Notice how he got back in the race that summer after dropping out when it seemed that Bush might be catching up. However this time, he threw Admiral Stockdale (poor guy) into the mix just to ensure he wouldn't actually win. All he wanted was to pull enough votes away from Bush to guarantee Clinton the victory.
I know it all sounds like some crazy conspiracy but evidently the Bushes did something in Texas to rub Perot the wrong way and this was his way of exacting a measure of revenge. It's probably nothing more than that.
One thing for sure, Perot is not the crazy nut people make him out to be. I just think he had absolutely no intention of actually being elected president.
Good article. But lacking any insight that he couldn’t have just picked up by reading FR for a couple of days.
Minor correction needed:
“This time around we have a flaming liberal against an avowed Marxist”/closet Muzzie.
Hope you don’t mind - your concept is spot on, just a bit deficient. ;-)
Muslims will be the only demographic group that will go and vote for their fellow Muzzie in greater numbers. With this group, he has delivered.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.