Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: edge919

“AND Elk excludes children from being under the operation of the 14th amendment...”

WOW!

You really ARE a fruitcake, aren’t you!


111 posted on 05/31/2012 7:37:44 AM PDT by Mr Rogers (A conservative can't please a liberal unless he jumps in front of a bus or off of a cliff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: edge919

Please remember that the poster wears obamanoid kneepads and will argue anything at FR to defend little barry bastard commie’s illegitimacy as legitimate.


112 posted on 05/31/2012 7:44:31 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Being deceived can be cured.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

To: Mr Rogers
Here's the direct quote to help you understand:
the plaintiff, if born while his parents were members of an Indian tribe, would not be embraced by the amendment even had he been at the time it was adopted, a permanent resident of one of the states, subject to taxation and in fact paying property and personal taxes, to the full extent required of the white race in the same state.

113 posted on 05/31/2012 8:04:04 AM PDT by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson