the plaintiff, if born while his parents were members of an Indian tribe, would not be embraced by the amendment even had he been at the time it was adopted, a permanent resident of one of the states, subject to taxation and in fact paying property and personal taxes, to the full extent required of the white race in the same state.
“if born while his parents were members of an Indian tribe”.
It was being part of an Indian nation that was the problem. It had nothing to do with someone just being a child.
“Anyone who reads those links is going to see that I’m right...”
I posted the links so anyone CAN read the decisions. There IS a reason no state and no court agrees with you. A fair reading of those decisions will make it obvious - and the answer is not a conspiracy.
“It clearly states that WKA did NOT define natural born citizen, and then directly contradicted that by citing WKA as a reason to find that Obama is a natural born citizen. That was a kangaroo court, plain and simple.”
No. What it said was that the court didn’t specifically write, “WKA is a NBC” is irrelevant. The argument they used in the decision says WKA met the definitions of NBC & 14th Amendment, and that those two definition are identical.
Of course, you can choose to refuse to believe that, but every court who reads it agrees with me. Every state in the union agrees with me. Every member of Congress agrees with me. When every court, every state and every member of Congress says the decision means A, and you insist it means not A, then your opinion is irrelevant. Further, your opinion is probably the opinion of an idiot, because your theory requires all of the USA to be in a conspiracy. And that is nutjob land...