Replies

Good post. People have different opinions. Like those photos don’t look like Ann to me but then I am not very good at looking at different photos and trying to figure them out. Perhaps if there was a better shot of those crooked teeth it would convince me.

But it doesn’t really matter if it is her in the photos. It could be her and FMD is the father or it could not be her and FMD could still be the father, etc.

Where FMD was in 1960 sure was relevant to Fred Nerks when I posted the realtor information on that house...with him demanding that I show proof that FMD was in Honolulu during 1960.

I did. He moved the goal post.

Motive is important.

I look forward to what Sheriff Joe has found out.

Well I'll just tweak that a little. Namely, if it could be established w a very high degree of certainty that the woman in the b&w ‘porn’ shots is SAD, it would increase in my mind the odds that FMD had sex w SAD. Once a man gets a woman naked in his house and has her pose provocatively, sex is not a big leap away. So to me it matters, but as I said, I have no idea who the woman is.

Let me add one other thing. There are a lot of women's names in the world. The odds of SAD and another woman just happening to share the exact same name and initial - Ann and S. - are not high. Ann IS one of SAD’s names, and S is the other initial. What a coincidence, that the other woman involved w Obama shares a name and the same initial. Coincidences do happen, but they're the exception not the rule. Just one more item to weigh in the general mix, fwiw.