YOU WANT FMD TO BE THE FATHER OF ZERO. I DON’T BELIEVE IT. IT’S REALLY THAT SIMPLE. AND I DON’T GIVE A HOOT WHERE HE LIVED ANYMORE. YOU GO FOR IT.
“YOU WANT FMD TO BE THE FATHER OF ZERO. “
Not correct whatsoever and I have stated this multiple times.
I have a personal opinion about where Ann might have been during those missing years. It’s based on the missing passport information and other information.
But it is just speculation.
Your speculation is no better than mine or the speculation by DL.
We do know as fact that FMD lived in Honolulu during 1960 so just stop the nonsense of pretending he didn’t live there.
RC has done a conclusive job of establishing where FMD lived in 1960. Either the FBI file is wrong or he lived in Honolulu.
I notice that now that's it's been reasonably established that FMD lived in Honolulu in ‘60, it no longer matters [though it mattered quite a bit before]. That's called moving the goal posts. When liberals do it, it's not okay. Is it okay when conservatives do it?
I still don't buy the FMD as BO father. I just don't see a sufficient physical resemblance, though heaven knows that is not dispositive.
I have no idea who the woman in the old time porn shots is. The fact that Snopes says it's not SAD makes me suspicious, however. Is this the same Snopes that said Obama was born in Queens Hospital? And then quickly changed their reference when Obama claimed the other hospital? Is this the same Snopes that toes every single Obot explanation for every single anomaly, inconsistency and contradiction in Obama’s nativity story? Sorry; don't trust them to the extent that when they say something related to Obama is fact, I immediately suspect the opposite. It's only a suspicion, but it is certainly that.
Motives do matter. Fred, you're pretty free in assigning ugly, vile motives to DiogenesLamp when it comes to researching FMD. Why then do motives matter not at all when it comes to supporting your Obama-theories? You can't prove your theories to be fact, so delineating motives is critical. The motives will either strengthen or weaken your case. What motive DO you assume, for such elaborate and serious law breaking? I would sincerely like to know.
When it comes to the baby pic you keep posting, here's where I come down. I will NOT argue it w you; one’s conclusions on this subject are subjective not objective. That being so, you can't prove your case and I can't prove mine. Therefore I will state my *impressions* and let it go at that. The paler of the two babies is not Obama. The ears are wrong. I know already you disagree. There's no need to browbeat me. But that is my sincere and honest judgment. If you can accept it w decency and at least a veneer of politeness, I'd appreciate it. If all you can do is insult and demean me, go whole hog. It's undercuts your case, but whatever; you do what you have to do.
As for my theory, I'm still waiting for more facts. I don't believe BO was born in HI. I did for a long time but I had to abandon that idea when too much info piled up against it. I don't believe his B-Day is 8-4-61. I believe he's told a plethora of other lies too. But as for specifics, I'm awaiting more info. Hopefully Zullo and Arpaio will fill in some blanks.
Best to you all—and please try to remember: we're all conservatives here. We are all dedicated to seeing Obama thrown out of office at the end of this term at the latest. So even when we disagree, why can't we be polite and respectful about it? Why not leave the name calling and insulting to the more childish and silly moonbats; heaven knows they're good at it, and can get by fine w'out any help from us.
Thank you in advance.