Looking for the reasons why people do things, rather than at what THEY DID will get you nowhere. You are trying to look into the minds of people who are dead.
It's a fact that Onaka didn't sign the 'verification' and the two items left off were:
THE NAME OF THE MOTHER. THE DATE OF BIRTH.
Why might that be? Could it be there IS a record of a birth in Hawaii for a Barack Hussein Obama II - but the birthdate doesn't match and the name of the mother isn't what you are supposed to believe it is?
Who was ANNA OBAMA? Who was the wife from whom he was separated, living in the Philippines?
Which child looks like the child of the kenyan and which child, somewhat younger, looks like zero?
If the light never goes on in your head, there's nothing I can do about it.
Motive in connection with a crime not relevant??????
Motive is different than intent but investigators usually look at motive.
You can’t explain why such a grandiose farfetched scheme would be put in place. And you also can’t seem to explain how it would be possible without the help of the CIA.
Dunhum was traveling in and out of Indonesia during very critical times. The CIA put Suharto in place. The US condoned the East Timor massacre. But yet, you think the CIA would allow a known communist sympathizer into the hot zone..one from a known sympathizing family who had concocted this grandiose scheme of fraud
Why would they do that? Of course knowing that the USAID was a front for the CIA. And knowing that it is well established in the anthropological world that the CIA , DOD , and other 3 letter agencies used anthropology as a front.