I did. You responded to my assertion that many junior service members aren't property owners and would be disenfranchised. You replied, "Then I suggest they have a strong incentive to get to be a property owner."
Now, unless you failed miserably to communicate what you were actually thinking, the only reasonable conclusion is that those junior service members should go buy property. In the context of this conversation, and this thread, that is the implied condition for enfranchisement. If that's not what you meant, then you need to work on your written communication skills.
"Why is it so difficult for you small mind to imagine that EVERYONE needs an incentive to own a piece of the American pie by hard work?"
Why is it so difficult for your small mind to imagine that those who are serving honorably, or those who have served honorably don't already merit a vote, regardless of their status as property owners? you don't think they have any "skin in the game"? You don't think a young soldier who's wearing this nation's uniform with pride and has deployed three times in the last six years deserves as much say in this nation's governance as some fat-ass trust fund limousine liberal who hasn't worked a day in his life, and just happened to inherit daddy's estate?
you are a trash reader and miss out on the point of most of the thread which was to incentivize people by owning land.
even the military, people who i take a back seat to no one in appreciating, should be owners of property.
go find someone else to condemn, partner.