To: bestintxas
How about being a landowner that actually pays taxes rather than receives money from the government? Those qualifications sound great.
12 posted on
05/24/2012 4:59:05 AM PDT by
she geek
To: she geek
One minute apart with the same idea...
13 posted on
05/24/2012 5:01:25 AM PDT by
MrB
(The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
To: she geek
How about being a landowner that actually pays taxes rather than receives money from the government? Those qualifications sound great. The land ownership requirement could be problematic. I know some real sponges that own land.
How about a ban on voting if you take any form of government money? This one thing would eliminate the practice of the takers voting themselves raises
56 posted on
05/24/2012 11:41:57 AM PDT by
Cowman
(How can the IRS seize property without a warrant if the 4th amendment still stands?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson