Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PapaBear3625
You think OWS thugs would not attack a Freeper or TEA Party get-together just as readily, and as violently, as they did these guys?

And the media would be right there waving the racist banner as a means of condoning it.
40 posted on 05/23/2012 2:51:33 PM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
And the media would be right there waving the racist banner as a means of condoning it.

Yeah, just like some FReepers on this thread are.

Kind of makes you go hmmm...

41 posted on 05/23/2012 2:53:10 PM PDT by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: cripplecreek; Responsibility2nd
Here's my viewpoint: In the United States, people have the right to hold and communicate whatever opinions they want, without having to be in fear of being violently attacked because violent people are offended.

This means that if somebody wants to say bad things about Mohammed, rant about "crackers keeping us down", or declare their dislike for black people, then that is protected speech, and they should enjoy the full protection of the law against any who would assault them over it.

42 posted on 05/23/2012 2:58:36 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (If I can't be persuasive, I at least hope to be fun.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson