Replies

I had no such intention and it would be obvious to any but the brain dead that I was going by your statement that the law limiting access to vital birth records was passed a dozen years before 0bama was born - rather than being changed recently in order to “accommodate 0bama”.

But go ahead and make wile eyed accusations of lies and attempts at attribution if that is what is going to get you through your day.

I had no such intention and it would be obvious to any but the brain dead that I was going by your statement that the law limiting access to vital birth records was passed a dozen years before 0bama was born - rather than being changed recently in order to “accommodate 0bama”.
I didn't make any statement about any changes to accommodate him. That comment was made by another poster at @reply 100 as you well know.

I'll just put up what I actually said to compare it to what you think I said...

@#129...

BC’s were once available to anyone upon request in Hawaii.

Here is a pickable link (opens in new screen)...@www.capitol.hawaii.gov - /hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/

Here is the timeline for - §338-18 Disclosure of records
[L 1949, c 327, §22; RL 1955, §57-21; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 30, §2; HRS §338-18; am L 1977, c 118, §1; am L 1991, c 190, §1; am L 1997, c 305, §5; am L 2001, c 246, §2]

So since at least 1949 there have been restrictions in Hawaii on disclosure.

Help me out here with your assertion. What decade were you talking about?

But go ahead and make wile eyed accusations of lies and attempts at attribution if that is what is going to get you through your day.
All I have to do is post what I actually said. The rest is your own doing, not mine.