I'll just put up what I actually said to compare it to what you think I said...
@#129...
Here is a pickable link (opens in new screen)...@www.capitol.hawaii.gov - /hrscurrent/Vol06_Ch0321-0344/HRS0338/
Here is the timeline for - §338-18 Disclosure of records
[L 1949, c 327, §22; RL 1955, §57-21; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; am L 1967, c 30, §2; HRS §338-18; am L 1977, c 118, §1; am L 1991, c 190, §1; am L 1997, c 305, §5; am L 2001, c 246, §2]
So since at least 1949 there have been restrictions in Hawaii on disclosure.
Help me out here with your assertion. What decade were you talking about?
But go ahead and make wile eyed accusations of lies and attempts at attribution if that is what is going to get you through your day.
All I have to do is post what I actually said. The rest is your own doing, not mine.
That is why I included “rather than” instead of “in addition to”. You made one statement in response to another statement, the two of which were mutually contradictory. It should be obvious to all but the brain dead that I was responding to the statement you made that CONTRADICTED the earlier statement.
I am sorry that such was confusing to you.