This gal continues to hit the nail on the head. She is right. Breitbart should stick to the facts and stop trying to protect themselves from the name calling that will come from the Left regardless.
It's time to go "all in". Get with it Breitbart.
The Breitbart people are scared. Like all the rest of the media. And there is good reason. The media has been threatened if they reported on this issue. The threats were serious enough that Mike Zullo, commander of Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse, has said at least one informant on that threat has left the country in fear for her life and others have quit their jobs. It is reported that Glenn Beck left Fox because a Fox Board of Directors member has financial ties to George Soros (the person who made the threats to the media companies including Fox) and Fox was thus refusing to provide protection to lower-level staffers who were constantly receiving threats.
More on those threats can be seen (with links) at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2873887/posts?page=62
And Andrew Breitart fell to the ground dead in what - for all I can tell, and I’ve been trying to get input from medical people as much as possible - was a heart attack induced by arrhythmia not likely to have been caused by the 60% blockage the ME found but rather by something electrical. Which is precisely the way that a potassium chloride heart attack assassination dart works.
The only way we would know if it was induced by a poison dart is by an examination of the skin for a tiny red mark where the dart went in - and the autopsy gives no indication that his skin was ever examined for that. The 3 photos that were taken of the intact external body could not have adequately documented all the skin on the body, and the ME doesn’t mention even looking at or zooming in on those photos. His own examination of the skin was only looking for injuries and evidence of medical intervention, and the dart hole would look like a bug bite.
So basically we’ll never know whether that heart attack was naturally-induced or induced by a poison. But Breitbart fell to the ground dead less than 5 hours after telling Sheriff Joe that his evidence of fraud and forgery was good and that he was glad he was making that evidence publicly available. His death came on the same day as Arpaio’s presser and on the same day that Rush Limbaugh received a “gift” referencing 2 famous assassinations, which shook Rush up a bit and was treated as a bomb threat.
Keep in mind that Rush and Breitbart are large independent voices who could have gotten Arpaio’s evidence into the general public.
Although Rush is serviced by Clear Channel (which is most probably one of the companies that received the Soros threat), he is large enough to be able to make his own rules if he so desires. He could have reported on Arpaio’s findings and made a big deal of it. Most likely Clear Channel would have pulled him from the air if he had done so, but they would still be obliged to pay him according to their contract. So Rush was a potential way for Obama to be exposed. Seems like the bomb threat worked though, because Rush hasn’t really addressed it.
Breitbart stands on his own - had not been threatened by Soros previously - and would have been particularly credible at this point because he has poo-poohed the eligibility issue based on there not being enough evidence. But his indication to Arpaio within 5 hours of his death was that Arpaio’s evidence was convincing.
So.... on the same day as Arpaio’s presser, the 2 large independent voices who could have - and in Breitbart’s case most probably WOULD have - proclaimed Arpaio’s findings to the general public were either threatened or dead.