“Karan was starting a business and hired a company in India owned by Okhandiar to create some custom software. Morris said the software was delivered on time, but a dispute arose. The lawsuit said that in 2008, Karan started attacking mLogica, which wasn’t involved in the issue, and “stated in one email that he would ‘work night and day to inflict the maximum amount of financial pain’ on mLogica. ”
According to the lawsuit, Karan on his blog accused Okhandiar and/or mLogica of never paying vendors, of “unscrupulous, unethical and illegal business conduct,” and of cheating and siphoning money from people they did business with.
Karan also emailed these allegations to mLogica’s clients and business partners using a list illegally obtained from the company, the lawsuit says.
During the jury trial, Morris said, Karan under oath could not identify even one unpaid vendor or defrauded customer. (In regular lawsuits, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff, but in defamation cases, the defendant must prove the validity of his statements.)”
Look at the email the defendant sent. He clearly gave the plaintiff evidence of intent which is required in a case like this with a non-public figure,
If you complain about a company in a blog don't send out emails to the company telling them that your intent is to ruin the them (company), or if you do be prepared to prove your posts. Jeeze!
Thank you. Proper analysis in post 3.
This is why we come here.
Good call!