[wtc911]

Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing. You say you were a Marine, did you ever see anybody start a fight then get his ass kicked? I have plenty of times.

If you have real evidence that proves who started the fight then please post it....I'll check back later for it.

[ExTxMarine]

Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing.

This is where you are WRONG!. This evidence shows that Zimmerman never put a finger on Martin except in a DEFENSIVE manner. Therefore, Zimmerman was the DEFENDANT and Martin was the ATTACKER.

Oh, now I get it, Zimmerman must have said a "dirty word", which so offended the 12-year old prepubescent, Skittles-toting toddler that he then punched Zimmerman. Therefore, it was Zimmerman's fault. I NOW understand you way of thinking.

[mass55th]

"Yep, all that evidence is exactly what I mean...it shows nothing except that there was a fight and Zimmerman was losing. "

You say a fight between Zimmerman and Martin occurred. One of the definitions of "fight" is to "take part in a violent struggle involving the exchange of physical blows. Show me the physical evidence on Zimmerman that proves he was "fighting" with Martin, and exchanged physical blows with him.