Posted on 05/16/2012 5:23:43 AM PDT by thackney
The White House on Tuesday pushed back against the oil and gas industry’s claims that the Obama administration is blocking domestic energy development, releasing a new analysis showing that 46 million acres of federal lands and waters leased for drilling are sitting idle.
According to the Department of Interior report, oil and gas companies are actively drilling or have launched development on less than a third of the 36 million acres they have leased offshore, and on just over half of their onshore leases.
That includes leases where the companies have not yet filed exploration and development plans with the federal government, and ones where companies have received drilling permits but haven’t launched the work. According to the report, the government has issued about 7,000 permits for exploration not yet under way on federal and Indian lands.
The Interior Department analysis, which updates an assessment issued last year, comes as industry leaders accuse the Obama administration of walling off access to domestic energy resources. In particular, industry leaders and their congressional allies complain about the Interior Department’s decision not to sell drilling leases in the Atlantic and Pacific oceans over the next five years.
With gasoline prices and the economy looming large at the ballot box this year, the administration has been emphasizing its commitment to an “all of the above” energy policy and especially touting its support for domestic natural gas production.
Administration officials said the report underscores the White House’s commitment to allowing oil and gas drilling on federal lands and waters.
“We continue to make millions of acres … available for safe and responsible domestic energy production on public lands and in federal waters,” said Interior Secretary Ken Salazar in a statement. “We also want companies to develop the tens of millions of acres they’ve already leased but have left sitting idle.”
But industry leaders argue that the administration’s numbers don’t reflect the sometimes-long lead times between buying leases and winning federal regulators’ approval to drill on those tracts, or the time needed to assess leases geologically before launching exploration.
‘Election-year politics’
American Petroleum Institute President Jack Gerard dismissed the report as “election-year politics” and said it was “absurd to contend the industry pays the government billions of dollars every year in bonus bids and rents to leave land idle.”
On the contrary, Gerard insisted, oil and gas companies develop leases as expeditiously as they can.
“The industry last year alone invested $200 billion in the United States,” Gerard said. “So we’re hardly sitting on anything. We’re waiting for Uncle Sam to give us permission to produce these resources.”
Industry representatives also argue that it takes time for companies to conduct technical research and plan for drilling – generally without any guarantee that they will find oil and gas.
Kathleen Sgamma, vice president of government and public affairs at the Western Energy Alliance, said the administration was trying “to deflect blame for leases that are not producing onto the industry.”
Sgamma said the alliance estimates that about half of non-production on onshore acres results from “redundant regulations and bureaucratic delays,” not industry disinterest.
‘Use it or lose it’
Some congressional Democrats have argued that the onus is on the industry to develop their existing holdings. They have proposed “use it or lose it” fees for undeveloped leases that would be paid on top of existing rental rates.
In a bid to spur development, the Interior Department already has boosted annual rental rates for offshore acres that are leased but haven’t started producing oil. The government also has shortened the leasing times for initial drilling in some shallower water depths and hiked the minimum bid for some offshore tracts from $37.50 to $100 per acre.
Separately Tuesday, the Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management kicked off the formal planning for a November lease sale in Alaska’s National Petroleum Reserve, when it asked energy companies and other stakeholders to say what parts of the region – if any – should be auctioned for drilling.
As many as 630 tracts covering 7.1 million acres in the reserve could be up for grabs.
Barky knows that the only way wind and solar will be accepted is to drive the cost of hydrocarbons off the chart.
Right, because five seconds after they do, dear leader’s going to jump in and suddenly cancel the leases. He’s done it before and he’s fooling himself if we think he won’t do it again.
Yeah: Put his money where his mouth is.
That is EXACTLY why the economy “refuses” to recover,
and why businesses aren’t hiring, expanding, or investing,
even though they have cash.
They don’t trust this fascist not to make their expenditures worthless by fiat.
If only there were “gay” leases available, Obama would be drilling them tomorrow because his position on “gay” leases has evolved.
Say for example you have a 10,000 acre lease.
You drill a well on the lease which comes in mainly a gas well with some condensate.
You need a pipeline access in order to produce the well, but you can't get pipeline access because of inviro regs.
You then shut the well in, but you cannot keep your lease unless you are actually producing from the well or you pay a shut in fee. So you pay a shut in fee.
Then you have what's refereed to as a performance clause in the lease. That means in order to keep the entire lease and not just the area where the one well is, you have to continue drilling operations.
Every new well you drill that can produce is then shut in and you pay a shut in fee.
You pay out but get nothing back.
If you abandon the lease you have to plug all the wells.
They need leases they can get their product out of and to market.
Say for example you have a 10,000 acre lease.
You drill a well on the lease which comes in mainly a gas well with some condensate.
You need a pipeline access in order to produce the well, but you can't get pipeline access because of inviro regs.
You then shut the well in, but you cannot keep your lease unless you are actually producing from the well or you pay a shut in fee. So you pay a shut in fee.
Then you have what's refereed to as a performance clause in the lease. That means in order to keep the entire lease and not just the area where the one well is, you have to continue drilling operations.
Every new well you drill that can produce is then shut in and you pay a shut in fee.
You pay out but get nothing back.
If you abandon the lease you have to plug all the wells.
They need leases they can get their product out of and to market.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.