To: rangerwife
I do not agree with it, but once he made the stop , he was no longer traveling, he was conducting local business.
DC is the jurisdiction that can and will convict you of DUI with ANY measurable alcohol in your system, no lower legal limit. Any out of towner stopped for traffic offense is a fishing expedition for those gun grabbers. A great place to avoid at all costs.
5 posted on
05/14/2012 6:55:19 PM PDT by
wrench
To: wrench
That makes sense, but this situation is still BS.
10 posted on
05/14/2012 7:12:50 PM PDT by
rangerwife
(Proud wife of a Purple Heart Recipient)
To: wrench
He saw a doctor at Walter Reed ~ military business. The cops had no jurisdiction.
11 posted on
05/14/2012 7:14:01 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: wrench
This reminds me of that case in New Jersey not too long ago.
12 posted on
05/14/2012 7:18:36 PM PDT by
rangerwife
(Proud wife of a Purple Heart Recipient)
To: wrench
DC says ANY stop for ANY reason is enough to be booked for illegal possession. If you are in an accident, run out of gas, stop to buy gas, get a flat, etc., that's enough for the DC cops.
Another good reason to not say nothin' except "no."
19 posted on
05/14/2012 8:18:46 PM PDT by
VanShuyten
("a shadow...draped nobly in the folds of a gorgeous eloquence.")
To: wrench
I do not agree with it, but once he made the stop , he was no longer traveling, he was conducting local business.By that logic, stopping for fuel, or even to answer the call of nature would place the man at risk.
24 posted on
05/14/2012 11:14:52 PM PDT by
Smokin' Joe
(How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
To: wrench
Yet oddly enough, no matter what they are doing or where they are, Congressmen are immune from arrest due to their traveling to and fro from Congress, per the Constitution. Just kind of ironic considering how DC is to everyone but pols. /rhetorical
26 posted on
05/14/2012 11:28:39 PM PDT by
PghBaldy
(First MADD and "drunk" checkpoints, now TSA and "terrorist" checkpoints, what next?)
To: wrench
I do not agree with it, but once he made the stop , he was no longer traveling, he was conducting local business. I disagree; the same logic could be applied to anyone stopping to buy fuel in a cross-country trip -- thus rendering the travel-law null and void.
36 posted on
05/15/2012 5:44:52 AM PDT by
OneWingedShark
(Q: Why am I here? A: To do Justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with my God.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson