[GOP_Party_Animal]

Yes, certainly if we waste our votes on Nut Goodie we’ll be far better off as “The First Gay President” is unleashed in his second term.

[xzins]

Goode is the only conservative in the race.

Are you going to tell us all that you think Romney is a conservative?

[kevcol]

if we waste our votes on Nut Goodie we’ll be far better off as “The First Gay President” is unleashed in his second term.

Many of us do not buy the argument that a vote for anyone but Willard is detrimental in the long run to Conservatives. In fact, I personally feel it just the opposite:

I can deal with sending the Gop-e a message, while gridlocking Obamao for another 4 years (or even maybe impeachment), improving or getting majorities in both houses, and having those [R]'s resisting the socialist agenda, and a chance for a true Conservative nominee in 2016. I know things will not get too out of hand to the point of no return (i.e. looking at record firearms and ammo sales) so I cannot be scared into voting for Willard.

VS

having a socialist [R] permanently moving the party left, institutionalizing abortion, homo-marriage, open borders, gun-grabbing, anti-christianity and a nanny state as the norm for both parties, and NO CHANCE for a Conservative nominee in our lifetime. I don't see more than 1 SCOTUS appointment in the next 4 years (Ginsberg) and Obamao has used up his lib allocation, so that is not even a reason for me to vote Willard (who would just nomiate liberals anyhow like he did in MA).

The added bonus of not voting for Willard is that I get to vote my conscience.