Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bernard Marx
“That oil shale deposit is very old news. In fact Jimmy Carter sponsored a big recovery plant there back in the 1970s but the project fizzled for technological reasons.”

It did not fail for that reason, it was strictly economics. The Parachute CO project was going full blast ahead when oil was around $40.00 a bbl. IMO the project scared the living hell out of OPEC, the price of oil dropped to around $9.00 bbl. Blam and damn, oil shale was no longer profitably viable, end of story.

41 posted on 05/13/2012 11:44:21 PM PDT by Sea Parrot (I'll be a nice to you as you'll let me be, or as mean as you make me be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Sea Parrot

You’re right but it all boils down to how one defines “technology.” I was using the word in the broad sense that shale oil extraction technology is not presently cost-competitive with other methods of oil extraction. I probably should used more specific language.


86 posted on 05/14/2012 7:38:49 AM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson