And to think I never have given his religion an effort of concern.
I couldn't care less.
I still won't vote for him because he is a lying socialist liberal snake!
As a Bishop, he is the highest ranking church official to ever be in this position, it is believed that he will continue to rise within the religion, and could some day be it's Pope, it's Prophet, he will become God at some point, as his religion and it's leaders inform him.
Romney first sought a meeting to request permission from his Prophet, before initiating his Presidential run in 2005.
(Trust in God, question everyone else)
There'll come a time when you'll have to choose ONE of these concepts to rely on.
I really don't get those who are so sure that Romney was a genuine liberal before and is a fake conservative now.
What is the evidence that either position is more or less genuine than the other?