Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Jobs? Employment Is At 40-Year High For Those 55 And Up
IBD ^ | 05/04/2012 | By JED GRAHAM, INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY

Posted on 05/04/2012 6:20:05 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

As the jobs crisis wears on, with payrolls still 5 million below their pre-recession peak, the share of age 55-and-older Americans working has recovered to near a 42-year high.

Workers under 55 have borne the brunt of the jobs recession, which may mean that its economic effects — due to long-term unemployment, underemployment and stretched household balance sheets — may linger.

Before the financial crisis, economists worried that labor shortages would develop in some occupations as baby boomers left the workforce.

But that's moved to the back burner since the recession began in December 2007. Job holders 55 and up have risen by 3.9 million — and fallen by 8.1 million among those under 55, Labor Department data show. It's been 50 months and counting since payrolls peaked, a post-war record. Labor releases the April jobs report on Friday morning.

Some of this shift reflects demographics. Thanks to aging baby boomers, the 55-and-older population has grown by just shy of 10 million since the end of 2007. Meanwhile, those age 35-44 have fallen by 2.5 million.

But that only explains part of the puzzle. Older workers are hanging on to jobs longer, in part because of lost housing wealth and smaller 401(k) balances than they had counted on.

Among those 55-and-up, the employment-to-population ratio barely dipped even in the depth of recession and is now higher than at the end of 2007. The ratio among those 25-54 remains about 4 percentage points lower than before the recession started.

For the 65-69 and 70-74 groups, the employed shares are up 1.1 percentage points and 1.6 percentage points, respectively, over the past four years.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: jobs; unemployment
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

1 posted on 05/04/2012 6:20:11 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How about the unemployment numbers by age? Boomers may be hanging onto their jobs for dear life but if you are “seasoned” AND unemployed, you are SOL. Then there’s that whole underemployed thingie.


2 posted on 05/04/2012 6:24:50 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Chen Guangcheng: Gutsy call, Obama /UltraMegaDrippingSarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Not a healthy “jobs” indicator so much as an economically unhealthy indicator that fewer older people are unable to comfortably retire.


3 posted on 05/04/2012 6:24:54 AM PDT by PapaNew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Lots of my fellow docs plan on working a long time since their retirement plans went poof.


4 posted on 05/04/2012 6:25:03 AM PDT by Kozak ("It's not an Election it's a Restraining Order" .....PJ O'Rourke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Many of the over 50 crowd are also working to support their unemployed kids, who have moved back with mom and pop.


5 posted on 05/04/2012 6:28:42 AM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
Roosevelt Institute intern Charlie Eisenhood dug up this data on the unemployment rate by age and education from the Current Population Survey (CPS). Here it is in September 2010:



And here it was in December 2007 when the recession started:



Here is the difference between the two, along with the percent increase, so a (100%) is a doubling:



What jumps out for me? College educated 20-24 year olds have the highest percentage increase. This should hit against a structural unemployment story, as college educated people have the ‘freshest’ skills and incredibly high mobility. It’s worth pointing them out in particular because if their careers hit a rough spot hysteresis sets in and they’ll have serious wage losses years down the road.

The other thing that jumps out at me is that everyone 55-64 has more than doubled their unemployment rate. One thing we aren’t talking about enough is that someone who is 60 and has been unemployed for a year isn’t going to find a decent job again. Why don’t we temporarily lower the retirement age, conditional on a bunch of hoops?

Why don’t we do that especially rather than raising the retirement age, as the December debate is likely to be over, when 55-64 year olds have had such a large jump in unemployment?

What jumps out at you when you look at this data?
6 posted on 05/04/2012 6:30:32 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind


Repeat after me: "Do you want fries with that?"

7 posted on 05/04/2012 6:32:45 AM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

As a 60 year old, I’m making more than ever. Enjoying work more than ever. And my incentive to retire is?


8 posted on 05/04/2012 6:33:04 AM PDT by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
One thing we aren’t talking about enough is that someone who is 60 and has been unemployed for a year isn’t going to find a decent job again.

That sounds like me! 55 years old, 3 college degrees (BS, MS, PhD) and unemployed for almost 3 years. I can't wait to turn 65!

9 posted on 05/04/2012 6:37:28 AM PDT by Former Fetus (Saved by grace through faith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
What jumps out at you when you look at this data?

That the best numbers fall into the unskilled categories, which tells me the jobs being created are not quality jobs. It also tells me that if you crank in the "underemployed" numbers, the story it would tell would be devastating.

10 posted on 05/04/2012 6:37:32 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (Chen Guangcheng: Gutsy call, Obama /UltraMegaDrippingSarc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: cicero2k

RE: As a 60 year old, I’m making more than ever. Enjoying work more than ever. And my incentive to retire is?

Just curious, just exactly what do you do for a living? Maybe I’ll tell me school age kids to follow your footsteps...


11 posted on 05/04/2012 6:40:15 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Although I am employed/underemployed now, I can tell you that if you are over 50, unemployed for over six months, even with a graduate degree, getting back in the game is tough.

I can’t tell you how many times I was perfectly qualified for a job, and was told the employer did not want anyone unemployed for over six months, despite experience or education. Plus a few recruiters who did not work directly for the corporation basically alluded the if you were over 50+, forget it.

I think the stats reflect that older crowd is staying put, once they find a gig.


12 posted on 05/04/2012 6:42:30 AM PDT by RonboTex (Get off my lawn!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m 58 and in IT. Getting work is easy if I contract. It is more difficult if I want to become an employee. That’s ok since the former pays more.

The reason for the difficulty is that companies want experienced people that are not too old. We are out of the “job for life” realm, but if you are over 55 they may get concerned about health care hits, training you in their specifics only to have you die or get too ill to work, etc. But with contracting, the more experience the better. An older guy can come in and do the work, mentor, and everything else until the contract, his health or his life ends, whichever comes first.


13 posted on 05/04/2012 6:43:17 AM PDT by cuban leaf (Were doomed! Details at eleven.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr
Many of the over 50 crowd are also working to support their unemployed kids, who have moved back with mom and pop.

I fall into that group. So wish my son could find a better paying job.

14 posted on 05/04/2012 6:44:26 AM PDT by OB1kNOb (The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty. - Prov 22:3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

This is why we need to kill all the old people with health care rationing.


15 posted on 05/04/2012 6:47:39 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Do I really need a sarcasm tag? Seriously? You're that dense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Retiring early would be suicidal right now.


16 posted on 05/04/2012 6:53:14 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: khelus
WAL-MART is the place to go for Seniors:


17 posted on 05/04/2012 6:54:04 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gender discrimination is real. Women are the preferred protected class of US citizen today. At least it seems to be here in SE Michigan. Actually, it’s gender and age discrimination. More and more younger women have made careers of recruiting and hiring more and more younger women to work in Human Resources as recruiters, account managers and those women hire more women to work in as many other industries as they can. It’s a concerted effort to increase their numbers in the total workforce. This is typical of an era of unchecked liberalism. It happened during the Clinton years and its’ happening again right now.


18 posted on 05/04/2012 6:54:13 AM PDT by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Walmart’s eh?

I have also seen grey haired people who looked like they belonged in an office setting in fast food places and at food store check-outs.


19 posted on 05/04/2012 7:00:36 AM PDT by khelus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: PapaNew
Absolutley!
20 posted on 05/04/2012 7:31:08 AM PDT by jennings2004 (President Hayes, Mount Rushmore, telephone, Dear Leader...what a mix!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson