I don’t see why any rational person would find it difficult to choose between ANY non-Obama candidate and the dog-eater.
We know what the dog-eater HAS done in his first term. And, thanks to his bungled handling of an “open mic”, we know what the dog-eater WANTS TO DO, if America’s most incompetent President EVER is re-elected.
So please don’t believe every poll-tested lie and every cleverly shaded half-truth deployed by the White House, as it tries to sow dissention among us patriots!
And please remember that “cutting off your nose to spite your face” is a form of madness...
“I don’t see why any rational person would find it difficult to choose between ANY non-Obama candidate and the dog-eater.”
I don’t see why any rational person doesn’t realize we have divided government.
Obama in the white house w/a republic congress and senate may actually be better for the country because less will get done.
That’s not enough to get me to vote for O, it’s just a tradeoff I can accept.
Excuse me. Why don't you cut-and-paste an example of "cleverly-shaded half-truth" with regard to the case against Romney.
Go ahead. Show where it's been spun.
Facts is fact, FRiend. Romney has a documented record of being pro:
-- Global warming cap-and-trade, and the eco-tyranny it represents
-- On-demand subsidized abortions (RomneyCare in Mass.)
-- Government-run health care with mandates
-- Forced acceptance of open homosexuality via gay "rights"
-- Appointing activist liberal judges to twist laws (see his record in Mass.)
Your "poll-tested lie and cleverly shaded half-truth" angle is make-believe. I don't know which would be worse for you, not knowing it or knowing it and still pressing on -- but it doesn't matter. Voting for Romney is as nuts as voting for Obama.