Assumed what???
You say a vote for Romney is a vote for Obama with no facts in evidence.
You base your opposition on the single issue of health care, assuming that were Romney to win he would create a National Plan on his own.
1. He has stated he opposes a national single payer plan and that he believes any effort at widespread coverage should be done at the state level.
2. A republican Congress would never allow a mandatory health care plan, especially if the Supreme Court rejects any or all of the current model. If the Supreme Court accepts the Obama plan as constitutional, we may be stuck with it and the potential Presidency of Romney becomes irrelevant respective of that issue. Even Obama was not the driving force behind the plan he wants to take credit for. It was created and pushed through congress by Pelosi and Reid.
3. When Scott Brown ran for the Senate seat vacated by Ted Kennedy he stated that the plan has been altered for the worst by democrats in the legislature after adoption and that process was part of his opposition to a national plan because he saw what a slippery slope it could be.
You assert that I am drinking Romney kool-aid. Although I have said he is not my favored candidate, I am trying to look at things objectively. If he is the nominee, I believe he is our only hope at ending Obama's career and we must work together to influence his style of governance. When you asked I offered what I thought were distinct differences between him and the community organizer. Beyond health care which he can't control alone, you aren't giving me the reasons you say he and Obama are the same. Again, looking at the Middle-East, International Foreign Policy, our borders, our domestic economy, treatment of our military, budget, taxation and education, I think they have very different views and opinions. For those reasons and contrasts, I would be much happier to cast my vote for Romney than I was for John McCain.