Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: af_vet_1981; Jim Robinson; Dr. Brian Kopp; trisham; DJ MacWoW; little jeremiah; Coleus; narses; ...
No, the Supremes could reverse Roe vs. Wade but that would not derail the legal abortion train.

This is 100% WRONG!

Read the Roe v. Wade decision sometime, it is explicitly stated that if personhood of the baby is established then 14th Amendment protection is guaranteed. And this FACT is not only in the decision, it is acknowledged by ALL PARTIES.

So, the only question is whether or not the baby is a person. However, if someone is to contend that the baby is not a person, what is it?

2,285 posted on 05/01/2012 10:12:08 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2238 | View Replies ]


To: wagglebee

Thank you so much for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!


2,287 posted on 05/01/2012 10:31:16 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2285 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee

EXCELLENT POINTS, as usual.


2,289 posted on 05/01/2012 11:11:38 AM PDT by Quix (Times are a changin' INSURE you have believed in your heart & confessed Jesus as Lord Come NtheFlesh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2285 | View Replies ]

To: wagglebee
This is 100% WRONG! but still the way it is.
2,327 posted on 05/03/2012 8:29:05 PM PDT by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2285 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson