Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: No One Special

I would like to know why these “inspectors” are allowed on these farms. Are people fined if they don’t let them on their property? This is a serious question, because I would think that the “inspectors” would be trespassing if people don’t want them there. We have a fence and a gate that clearly says “No Trespassing,” and we don’t open the gate for just anyone.

That said, if the “inspectors” do show up, the parents and children could just explain that they are not “working,” they are “playing.” Then the “inspector” would have to prove somehow that the activity is not play, which would be pretty hard if the child insisted that it was and that he was having fun.


31 posted on 04/25/2012 7:12:15 AM PDT by nanetteclaret (Unreconstructed Catholic Texan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: nanetteclaret

Seems to me you’d need a warrant.
Also seems to me any evidence leading to a warrant that was obtained through spy drones or satellites should be thrown out.


32 posted on 04/25/2012 7:14:48 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: nanetteclaret
If they pass enough stupid, intrusive, nonsensical laws they will ultimately be able to control all of us, as we will all unwittingly become criminals. It will then be up to the government to decide what laws they will enforce and which people they will prosecute. If you get out of line, they will find a law you have broken and get at you in that way. Look what's happened to Ted Nugent. You'll notice that Donald Trump has also vanished from the scene after a period of very vocal criticism of the regime. Look at what the Murdochs are going through. The only one left standing is Arpaio, God bless him.
35 posted on 04/25/2012 7:23:32 AM PDT by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: nanetteclaret
Then the “inspector” would have to prove somehow that the activity is not play, which would be pretty hard if the child insisted that it was and that he was having fun.

The government man doesn't have to prove anything.Once charged, its up to the farmer to prove he's "not guilty"

We had some run ins the feds for selling "non inspected meat"(fresh and smoked sausages that we eat ourselves)

He confiscated some of our supply(luckily it was near the end of our sales and we didn't show him our freezer of fresh sausages) and gave us a warning. To contest it was more costly than what it was worth so we let it slide

For the next year we kept our roadside sign down and just sold it to our regular costumers.

Haven't had a problem since... Ssssssh! Its a secret!!!!
48 posted on 04/25/2012 8:20:40 AM PDT by RedMonqey (Men who will not suffer to self govern, will suffer under the governance of lesser men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson