To: Eleutheria5
And where he sticks his pecker is relevant to national security because....?
For someone to think such an ignorant thing like that tells me you have no problems with the Secret Service hooker scandal currently ongoing now.
209 posted on
04/24/2012 11:07:37 AM PDT by
Responsibility2nd
(NO LIBS. This Means Liberals and (L)libertarians! Same Thing. NO LIBS!!)
To: Responsibility2nd
No, I have a problem with a news story about a new national security and foreign policy spokesman for Romney, and instead of talking about what he has done and what he believes should be done in those vital fields, all those MSM idiots can talk about is gay this and gay that. Why not just make him a gay policy spokesman, and have done?
249 posted on
04/24/2012 11:39:40 AM PDT by
Eleutheria5
(End the occupation. Annex today.)
To: Responsibility2nd
Same reason it has always been - blackmail. People of questionable character and behaviors are always a higher security risk. I would know.
420 posted on
04/24/2012 5:53:47 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson