Dogs Against Romney Defends Obama Over Dog Consumption Revelations (WOW...)

Mediaite ^ | 4-18-12 | James Crugnale

[tcrlaf]

The founder of the grassroots organization Dogs Against Romney called the Romney campaign “desperate” for dredging up the revelations that President Obama ate dog meat as a child in Indonesia.

“It seems desperate for the Romney campaign to bring up something that happened to Obama when he was 10 years old, not preparing his own meals, in a country where eating dog meat probably isn’t all that unusual as if it compares in any way to Romney, as a 36-year old adult, in America, making the conscious decision to strap his family pet to the roof of a car for a 12-hour drive, and leaving it up there even after it got sick.”

RELATED: Conservative Twitter-sphere Goes Wild After Daily Caller Reveals Obama Consumed Dog As A Child

[mvpel]

http://indefenceofliberty.org/story/319/61/Privatize-the-tiger-to-save-it

India’s tigers or elephants die because nobody owns them. Tragically, their killing is encouraged by their protectors—government forest guards who split the Rs2 lakh or so a poacher makes from killing a tiger.

[tcrlaf]

Well, it is an OBAMA-EAT-DOG world out there, folks.

[Deb]

You’re on fire, today!

[Ironfocus]

It is not so much the fact that he ate dog as a child, but that as a grown-up he saw fit to document and brag about it.

[Marguerite]

WILMINGTON, Del. - Newt Gingrich on Wednesday chastised as “utterly stupid” a Twitter debate between top aides to President Obama and Mitt Romney over the two campaigns’ respective controversial histories with canines: “I have been watching the totally stupid exchanges between Axelrod and the Romney people today over dogs and this and that - it is just utterly stupid.”

Gingrich said, “One reason I’m running for president is to re-arouse that conversation in the American people that... this is a country with really big problems. And we have a president who deliberately trivializes politics into junk because as long as it is distracting us from the real problems, he is better off. Because when you get to the real problems, he has no answers.”

“I think we ought to be the serious party and we ought to blow right past that stuff,” Gingrich continued. “I think in that context, the more serious we are, and the more sincere we are, the better we will do as a party and the better we will do as a country and I believe the American people are hungry for leadership that transcends the normal junk.”

[null and void]

It’s either in my heart or my belly...

[NathanR]

I know. I live in Orange County, home of Little Saigon.

[x]

Newt Gingrich on Wednesday chastised as “utterly stupid” a Twitter debate between top aides to President Obama and Mitt Romney over the two campaigns’ respective controversial histories with canines: “I have been watching the totally stupid exchanges between Axelrod and the Romney people today over dogs and this and that - it is just utterly stupid.”

Sure, but you know what we'd be hearing about if Newt were the front-runner ...

[SunkenCiv]

Thanks tcrlaf.

The founder of the grassroots organization Dogs Against Romney called the Romney campaign "desperate" for dredging up the revelations that President Obama ate dog meat as a child in Indonesia.

Yeah, it's just culturally insensitive to bring that up. And bringing up the extrajudicial murders carried out literally every day by Zero's fellow Muzzies everywhere? That's culturally insensitive too. /s

[rantblogger]

Not just Obummer's childhood...

http://www.dogsagainstobama.com/passion-of-obama/

NOT Just Obama’s Childhood — Obama Did More for Michael Vick Than the Canine Vicktims – the Passion of Obama Posted on April 19, 2012

Remember this November… Obama expended more energy on behalf of Michael Vick than on Vick’s 100+ victims of dog-fighting and drowning.



More from the “more equal than others” presidency. If Vick was a third string bench-warming non-minority, do you think for a moment that Obama would have argued for leniency from the NFL?

According to a CBS News report, Eagles owner Lurie said Mr. Obama was “passionate about it,” adding that the president said “it’s never a level playing field for prisoners when they get out of jail. And he was happy that we did something on such a national stage that showed our faith in giving someone a second chance after such a major downfall.”

If dogs could talk, what would Bo say?

Related:

Obama does not thank man who rescued Vick’s dogs – January 3, 2011 by Don Surber Best Friends Animal Society Responds To Obama, Vick Second Chance Story – December 31, 2010 Commentary Magazine suggests that Obama may have been crassly pandering to the Pennsylvania electorate.: Why Did Barack Obama Endorse Dog-Killing QB?

Regarding the latter, had this been perpetrated in a deep red state like Texas, no doubt that Obama would have politically leveraged this to the hilt.

[rantblogger]

Speaking of culturally insensitive...

Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner?

[gusty]

The answer of the question on the Vick poster is , he ate them.

[KeyLargo]

Hitler Finds Out Obama Ate His Dog

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nEBN8wOKjMo

Click ‘skip ad’ and go directly to the video.

[SparkyBass]