Skip to comments.
US: Strike on N. Korea Possible if Nuclear Test Held
KBS World ^
| April 17, 2012
| Not Listed
Posted on 04/18/2012 3:23:02 AM PDT by No One Special
The commander of the U.S. Pacific Command says the U.S. may launch a surgical strike against missile bases and nuclear test sites in North Korea if it conducts a third nuclear test.
Admiral Samuel Locklear explained the U.S.'s position on Tuesday at a meeting with South Korean defense journalists at the South Korea-U.S. Combined Forces Command (CFC) in Seoul.
Locklear said Washington is closely watching the North in relation to the possibility of a third nuclear test, adding the U.S. and South Korea are looking at all options including a surgical strike.
Regarding the Norths new long-range ballistic missile unveiled on Sunday, Locklear said the U.S. will closely monitor the Norths missile development in cooperation with South Korea and other allies.
The commander added that the U.S. will maintain its military presence of about 28-thousand-500 troops in South Korea.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: noko; nokorea; norks; northkorea; nukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
To: No One Special
Yeh...right...There are other countires involved in this. Have you talked to Japan lately?? Or China?? Or Russia?? Maybe mention it to the UN??
To: No One Special
If this were to happen the response would immediately be a torrent of missiles raining down on Seoul which is only about 32 miles south of the border.
But it would be a remarkable wag the dog moment for obammy about Oct. 15th. And NOTHING out of this marxist narcissist would surprise me./
3
posted on
04/18/2012 3:27:53 AM PDT
by
Joe Boucher
((FUBO) Hey Mitt, F-you too pal)
To: No One Special
4
posted on
04/18/2012 3:29:56 AM PDT
by
bmwcyle
(I am ready to serve Jesus on Earth because the GOP failed again)
To: No One Special
substitute “Iran” for “North Korea” and I’m in.
To: Sacajaweau
Or South Korea, which could/would lose a quarter of its population as a consequence?
6
posted on
04/18/2012 3:44:01 AM PDT
by
ctdonath2
($1 meals: http://abuckaplate.blogspot.com/)
To: No One Special
C'mon now, this is all craziness. We KNOW that North Korea became our new 'Partner for Peace' in the far east after President George W. Bush took Pyongyang OFF the list of terrorist supporting nations in late 2008, and by choosing the path of diplomacy with the famous 'Six Party Talks', North Korea dismantled their nuclear program and became a responsible member of the community of nations. And by NOT listening to those warmongers Cheney and Bolton (arguing for military action both against North Korea AND Iran), George W. Bush was able to pave the way for the late Dear Leader and our current Dear Reader to let the comradely friendship between our two nations blossom.
Pardon me, I must lay down as I am about to swoon.
(I sure-TF hope I don't need a 'sarc' tag on this)
7
posted on
04/18/2012 3:52:59 AM PDT
by
mkjessup
(Finley Peter Dunne- "Politics ain't beanbag")
To: No One Special
I honestly couldn’t see this administration attacking NK even if it sank one of our aircraft carriers.
8
posted on
04/18/2012 4:01:14 AM PDT
by
servo1969
To: ctdonath2
It's our 20,000 troops that disturbs me....60 years later.
I know we have troops all over the world...but it seems that it was a war that should have been finished. North Korea is a mess and south Korea is flourishing.
To: servo1969
No, but they sure would be “outraged”. This would be “not acceptable”, and they would strongly “condemn” them. That would put them in their place.
To: JudyinCanada
The Korean War was never ended, there is an armistace. It was a UN action, thank you President Truman for subverting us to this second class status. So, would not the UN now have to approve a restart of a shooting war? Unless NK actually did something directly against the US, alone, where is our authority to in effect declare war upon them regardless of what they did. Why, we never even blew them off the planet after the Pueblo incident of the 60s wherein we had the right to wipe them out IMO.
11
posted on
04/18/2012 4:11:57 AM PDT
by
Mouton
(Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
To: No One Special
This situation is like having a child and allowing him/her to do whatever they want for much of their lives. Then, suddenly bringing down the rod of correction and expecting an instant end to unruliness.
LMAO!
12
posted on
04/18/2012 4:30:00 AM PDT
by
wolfcreek
(‘closed eye’ mentality is the reason for our current reality)
To: Sacajaweau
Yeh...right...There are other countires [sic] involved in this. Have you talked to Japan lately?? Or China?? Or Russia?? Maybe mention it to the UN?? Has it been mentioned to the POTUS?
13
posted on
04/18/2012 4:32:08 AM PDT
by
luvbach1
(Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
To: Principled
14
posted on
04/18/2012 4:33:25 AM PDT
by
Carriage Hill
(I'd vote for a "orange juice can", before 0bummer&HisRegimeFromHell, gets another 4yrs. Can-> later.)
To: No One Special
US: Strike on N. Korea Possible if Nuclear Test Held Very doubtful, at least until it is closer to the election.
15
posted on
04/18/2012 5:09:00 AM PDT
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Sworn to Defend The Constitution Against ALL Enemies, Foreign and Domestic. So Help Me GOD!)
To: No One Special
Sounds like the Norks are getting closer to actually having a test that works.
16
posted on
04/18/2012 5:20:35 AM PDT
by
Lazamataz
(Shut up and drill.)
To: No One Special
Ordinarily the Media would be collectively wetting their pants over talk like this. I guess they aren’t because Obama doesn’t want to talk about it. And he doesn’t want to talk about it because it doesn’t fit in with his re-election strategy — which we see involves outraged minorities.
17
posted on
04/18/2012 5:24:11 AM PDT
by
Tallguy
(It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
To: No One Special
Not by this Coward in Chief!
18
posted on
04/18/2012 5:37:56 AM PDT
by
G Larry
(We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
To: No One Special
Won’t happen. A missile could hit the coast of California and I’m not entirely sure we’d do anything besides “strongly condemn” and “enforce stronger sanctions and isolation”.
To: Principled
Not really much difference, given their cooperation on missile and nuclear technology.
20
posted on
04/18/2012 6:01:47 AM PDT
by
edpc
(Wilby 2012)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson