Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP senators sue Obama over sham labor board nominees
The Washington Wxaminer ^ | April 17, 2012 | Paul Bedard

Posted on 04/17/2012 7:53:38 PM PDT by Semper911

In a double-barrelled blast at President Obama, Senate Republicans today moved to join a lawsuit challenging the White House’s Christmas “recess appointment” of National Labor Relations Board members even though the Senate was technically in session. To handle their case, they hired Miguel Estrada, who in 2002 became the first-ever judicial nominee to be torpedoed by a Democratic filibuster.

“The president’s decision to circumvent the American people by installing his appointees at a powerful federal agency, when the Senate was not in recess, and without obtaining the advice and consent of the Senate, is an unprecedented power grab,” McConnell said. “We will demonstrate to the court how the president’s unconstitutional actions fundamentally endanger the Congress’s role in providing a check on the excesses of the executive branch.”

The fight is over a simple issue: When is the Senate technically in session. The GOP argues that there was enough action over the holidays to determine that the chamber was in session, but the president disagreed and went ahead with the appointments.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gop; miguelestrada; nlrbappointee; norecess
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: DBeers

My question: by what authority did the judge “decline” to rule? Is that like nobama deciding to not support DOMA?


21 posted on 04/17/2012 9:03:09 PM PDT by upchuck (Need is not an acceptable lifestyle choice; dependent is not a career. ~ Dr. Tim Nerenz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Damn. McConnell is showing faint signs of testicles. I am impressed.


22 posted on 04/17/2012 9:06:38 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Whats-wrong-with-the-truth

Start somewhere.


23 posted on 04/17/2012 9:09:17 PM PDT by Lazamataz (Shut up and drill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
What a bunch of silly pussies.

Congress begging the Judicial Branch to intervene...when Congress has the power to remove a POTUS and the judicial branch does not.

Silly pussies. Disgusting excuses for citizens if you ask me.

24 posted on 04/17/2012 9:14:17 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Putting his buddies on the NLRB is not too different from when FDR sought to pack the Supreme Court by expanding it from 9 to 15 with the additional 6 being his hand-picked far left pals. This should be shot down though The One might withdraw these appointments before push comes to shove; after all, he IS a chicken.

I like your idea about impeachment - that is what needs to happen but not til after the elections when we own both the House and Senate. As it stands now, Reid would never bring the bill up for a vote.


25 posted on 04/17/2012 9:15:55 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

Putting his buddies on the NLRB is not too different from when FDR sought to pack the Supreme Court by expanding it from 9 to 15 with the additional 6 being his hand-picked far left pals. This should be shot down though The One might withdraw these appointments before push comes to shove; after all, he IS a chicken.

I like your idea about impeachment - that is what needs to happen but not til after the elections when we own both the House and Senate. As it stands now, Reid would never bring the bill up for a vote.


26 posted on 04/17/2012 9:16:20 PM PDT by Rembrandt (.. AND the donkey you rode in on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: upchuck
My question: by what authority did the judge “decline” to rule? Is that like nobama deciding to not support DOMA?

From the article I linked:

In his decision issued Tuesday, District Judge Brian Cogan said the constitutional question has no bearing on his opinion about the injunction. "In the interest of judicial restraint, the Supreme Court has counseled that a court should not decide a constitutional question unless the question is absolutely necessary to the court's decision," he said.

P.S. I first found the referenced article through a google search and just noticed that when you follow a direct link it only shows a preview. A trick to get around this and see the complete article is to search for the title in google then click the link in google and you should see the complete article...

27 posted on 04/17/2012 9:17:45 PM PDT by DBeers (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Ping for tomorrow.


28 posted on 04/17/2012 9:21:26 PM PDT by Batman11 (Obama's poll numbers are so low the Kenyans are claiming he was born in the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Sue him? The Republican led House should impeach the treasonous usurper!!


29 posted on 04/17/2012 9:23:11 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (There's no crying in rebellion!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Payback’s a bitch, eh Miguel?

Revenge is sweet.

Time to take the bastards down!


30 posted on 04/17/2012 9:48:26 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"Start somewhere"

I agree. How about starting with enforcing the laws he's already broken, having him arrested and tried for treason?

Nahhhh We don't have anyone in washington with the eggs to honor the oath they took to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States from all enemies both foreign and domestic. Obomba is a foreign citizen of two countries and has yet to prove he is even a citizen of the United States and NO ONE in authority is arresting him. He is the most corrupt world leader that has ever lived and nobody is doing anything to stop him. Like Rush replies when asked, why does obomba do the things he does? Rush, "Because he knows nobody is going to stop him."

If romney wins the Republican nomination we can seriously kiss our country goodbye.

I guess my point is... If we're going to "start somewhere" start with enforcing the Constitution and immediately. Where are the Joint Chiefs?

Aaaaahhhhh.... Now I'm ranting. Rome's burning and the inmates are too stupid to put out the flames.

31 posted on 04/17/2012 9:54:02 PM PDT by Whats-wrong-with-the-truth (Romney... Just put the (D) behind your name and be done with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Semper911

Perhaps we’re all still in shock that a few near-worthless Senate RINOs might have finally started trying to grow a pair...?

That or we all figure the good Senator Mitch “Reach Around” McConnell will eventually torpedo this before it gets started.


32 posted on 04/17/2012 10:07:55 PM PDT by snuffy smiff (Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Semper911
It also should have been acted on the minute it happened...

I recall reading an article around the time of the "appointments", ie within one or two news cycles, that the nature of the transgression required the injured party to bring suit. The injured party, though, not being the Senate but rather any subsequent NLRB action and it's directly affected parties.

33 posted on 04/17/2012 10:40:33 PM PDT by C210N (Go Newt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

The Pubs may have waited so the courts didn’t refuse to hear their case under the political question doctrine. IANAL but that’d be my first guess.


34 posted on 04/17/2012 11:24:24 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mariner

The Pubs control only the House. So they can bring impeachment charges, but what would that accomplish? The Dems control the Senate where the impeachment must be tried.


35 posted on 04/17/2012 11:30:31 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: upchuck

If I had to guess, I’d say he declined under the political question doctrine. ICBW.


36 posted on 04/17/2012 11:36:09 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: BuckeyeTexan

“So they can bring impeachment charges, but what would that accomplish? The Dems control the Senate where the impeachment must be tried.”

Yes - and that’s exactly what the problem was with impeaching Slick Willie. The House “impeached” him, but the Senate didn’t seal the deal.


37 posted on 04/18/2012 12:17:57 AM PDT by llandres (Forget the "New America" - restore the original one!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: llandres
The House “impeached” him, but the Senate didn’t seal the deal.

The House didn't "impeach" Clinton. The House actually impeached him. Not "sort of impeached." Not "in effect, impeached him." But in every legal and Constitutional sense, the House impeached Bill Clinton.
38 posted on 04/18/2012 12:31:28 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

WHY did the republicans not file a suit instead of waiting for a private company to do the heavy lifting?...The court would have decided the Republicans had no standing (crassly put, they had no skin in the game) to bring this lawsuit up.


39 posted on 04/18/2012 12:41:56 AM PDT by Safetgiver (The predator class is upset because they are being shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion

That was rhetorical, right? The eGOP barely cares more about the Constitution than obastard...


40 posted on 04/18/2012 1:06:20 AM PDT by piytar (The predator-class is furious that their prey are shooting back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson