[LucianOfSamasota]

A few other categories should be added:

My point was that in addition to those mentioned by Jim, there are other points worth consideration. We have to survive as a nation for any post-2012 strategy to have meaning. I, for one, still believe the world is a dangerous place. And unilateral disarmament will leave us vulnerable to foreign aggression. 'Peace through strength' is how Reagan put it.

So there are domestic concerns and there are foreign policy concerns. Each category bears on our future.

[SoConPubbie]

My point was that in addition to those mentioned by Jim, there are other points worth consideration. We have to survive as a nation for any post-2012 strategy to have meaning. I, for one, still believe the world is a dangerous place. And unilateral disarmament will leave us vulnerable to foreign aggression. 'Peace through strength' is how Reagan put it.

I think we got your point.

ANd I am sure you have gotten ours, the differences between Newt and Mitt are gigantic, the differences between Mitt and Obama are almost differences without distinction.

Because of that lack of difference between Mitt and Obama, he cannot and will not win if God Frowns on us and lets him be our nominee.

Instead of pimping a sure-fired loser on a conservative site when there are 46% of the delegates yet to be won, maybe, if you truly are a sincere conservate, you could join the rest of us and try and defeat the enemy to conservatism, Mitt Romney.

That is IF you are a sincere conservative.