[rawhide]

I thought the liberal occupiers loved ultra-liberal Starbucks?

[E. Pluribus Unum]

I thought the liberal occupiers loved ultra-liberal Starbucks?

Only if they get free lattes.

[PGR88]

I thought the liberal occupiers loved ultra-liberal Starbucks?

these clowns are off-the-charts nuts. I guess they would call themselves Anarchists.

[samtheman]

I thought the liberal occupiers loved ultra-liberal Starbucks?

Like the Sons Of Obama looters and rioters, these types of mobs tend to stay in their own neighborhoods and attack their own people. (They don't want to fight anybody who might fight back. OUCH! That could hurt!)

[taildragger]

I thought the liberal occupiers loved ultra-liberal Starbucks?

No, they are not Commie enough to be down with the struggle, that is why they attacked Stalinbuks, to send a message. Ya know, that whole Russian Revolution thing which I flunked in history, ya know Bolsheviks vs. the ?

Now the Uber-Liberals get to see the evil-spawn-seed of their ways.

Maybe a wake-up moment for them....

[B Knotts]

I thought the liberal occupiers loved ultra-liberal Starbucks?

Incorrect. The anarchists in Portland have been attacking Starbucks for years. A couple of years ago I think they firebombed one of their stores. I think it's happened in other places, as well.

More than anything, they despise success.

[driftless2]

"liberal occupiers"

There are radical leftists, and then there are the squishy liberals who frequent places like Starbucks and drink their lattes. Similar to the Bolsheviks who regarded well-meaning liberals who donated money to them as useful idiots. The squishy liberals think the radicals are on their side, while the radicals just think of liberals as tools to their ultimate goal of a leftist totalitarian system and mass murder.