[MamaTexan]

She seems to have it all backwards, and even claimed it was not a Supreme Court ruling!

As I never said any such thing, you are a blatant liar.

[BroJoeK]

BJK in post #305 to rustbucket, referring to MamaTexan's views on Prigg vs Pennsylvania: "She seems to have it all backwards, and even claimed it was not a Supreme Court ruling!"

MamaTexan responding in post #307: "As I never said any such thing, you are a blatant liar."

But in post #257, MamaTexan did deny that Prigg vs. Pennsylvania was a Supreme Court ruling:

"BS! That was a finding by the Appeals Court FOR the Supreme Court.
Appeals Courts set LEGAL PRECEDENTS:"

Of course, I don't claim that MamaTexan is a "blatant liar", just that she is obviously very confused and distraught.

;-)