>> You’re all too eagerly rolling over for evil, just as Levin and other weaklings are doing.
People like you disgust me. You stand for nothing, so you’ll fall for anything.<<
It’s called LESSER of two evils, genius. Mark Levin has spent more time than most exposing Romney’s non-conservatism. But he isn’t an idiot, like those nitwits who prefer an Obama presidency.
Continue on with your shrieking and hysterics.
Amended and made your tagline more family-friendly, hope u don’t mind.
Which means what, exactly? That I should willingly choose EVIL instead of sticking by the principles that made this a free country? That's a capitulation that will cause far greater harm in the future than you're apparently grasping.
Surrender your core principles now, and you've surrendered them forever. Romney has already demonstrated (by his documented record) that he's as much a liberal as Obama is, yet there you sit, demanding that those of us who give a damn about this nation forget all that, and support him anyway, simply because he calls himself a Republican.
Do you not understand the potential dynamics at work here? Who do you think a Republican dominated Congress is more likely to oppose - a liberal Democrat president, or a liberal Republican president? Who do you think the American people are most likely going to put up a fight against?
George W Bush gave the Dems nearly everything they wanted, and they walked on him like a rug. His many capitulations to the left gave us Obama. Romney would bend even further, and do FAR more damage to the country AND to the cause of conservatism.