Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; B4Ranch; Utah Binger; Eaker; rockinqsranch; Pete-R-Bilt; ...
I’m not going to give you grief over a vote for Mitt, but he’s not getting my vote only to see me trash him non-stop for four years.

I don’t share his values.

I’m sorry the party couldn’t do better, but consider me out.

That, sir, is the hat trick. I'll be writing in Sarah Palin.

Just a note here to the asshats who are bound to accuse me of "any vote not for Romney is a vote for Obama."

I live in Utah. Romney saved brother (former governor) Leavitt from the Olympics scandal indictments, so they're favorite sons of a feather. It's a MoTown thing. If, God forbid, Romney is the nominee, he'll handily take Utah.

BTW, I'm a $2/day FReeper, not a Republican, have never donated to the Republican Party, and will vote my conscience. The Tea Party is alive and kicking, thank you. There are a lot of (R)'s in the house, but the leadership is (R)ino-e.

Further note to "Republicans": y'all best be replacing the clowns at the top of your (R) establishment. In my estimation, they suck more than the out-of-the-closet communist (D)'s. At least the commies are committed to their effort, and the bastards are accomplishing what they set out to do, unlike the spineless Stupid Party.

Brokered convention? Hmmmm. Romney beats the Halfrican? Hmmmm. Romney's coattails drag a majority of Tea Party candidates to the Senate? Hmmmm. What could possibly go wrong?

See ya in the gulag.

666 posted on 04/13/2012 4:13:27 PM PDT by glock rocks (optimist , pessimist? I'm an awesomist - There's a dragon in that glass!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 571 | View Replies ]


To: glock rocks

I noted DoughtyOne’s mention of not agreeing with his values. The only values Romney has are himself, and him. Anything else that might be considered a value in association with Romney is BS.

I say we do all we can to get Newt some momentum. We have to make a try. Romney isn’t good for the country anymore than Obama.

We need a complete overhaul of personnel in this government, and I mean complete with deletion of most everything the Left has instilled over the years in that government. Get it back to the basics that was the foundation that Americans proudly adhered to make America the most desired location to reside on this Earth.


789 posted on 04/13/2012 5:18:07 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]

To: glock rocks
I’m not going to give you grief over a vote for Mitt, but he’s not getting my vote only to see me trash him non-stop for four years.  I don’t share his values.  I’m sorry the party couldn’t do better, but consider me out.

That, sir, is the hat trick. I'll be writing in Sarah Palin. Understanding your position, I support your plan.  Sarah is not my cup of tea, but she is yours and you should cast you vote in the manner you wish.

Just a note here to the asshats who are bound to accuse me of "any vote not for Romney is a vote for Obama."  I live in Utah. Romney saved brother (former governor) Leavitt from the Olympics scandal indictments, so they're favorite sons of a feather. It's a MoTown thing. If, God forbid, Romney is the nominee, he'll handily take Utah.  IMO, a no vote for Romney is as much a vote for him, as a vote for Obama.  Either claim is preposterous.  I had a family member say that my non-vote for McCain in 2008 was a vote for Obama.  I responded that they should be happy then, because a no vote for Obama should be seen as a vote for McCain.  They didn't find that humorous.  Glares to the "X".  Har...

BTW, I'm a $2/day FReeper, not a Republican, have never donated to the Republican Party, and will vote my conscience. The Tea Party is alive and kicking, thank you. There are a lot of (R)'s in the house, but the leadership is (R)ino-e.  Over the last 43 years, I have spent all but one of them as a Registered Republican.  I don't think I've ever cast a vote for a Democrat at any level.  While my natural leanings are toward the Republican party since I registered as one at 18 years of age by reasoned choice (alternative was to back the party of Jane Fonda and anti-war, and anti-U.S. designs), when I became aware at what I'd reference as an elevated level, I was not inclined to back liberal actions within it's ranks.

In truth, I have seen Republicans make screw-ups over the years, but they were mostly an anomoly.  During the cold war, we stood as one against Communism and it's treachery.  Once the U. S. S. R. disolved, some within our ranks seemed to think it would be okay to move farther Left, actually buying into their concepts.  Others were merely luke warm Republicans, nowhere near the lock-step of those who hold this nation dear, and are not willing to sell out on Soverignty, our Founding Documents, or our Founding Fathers and their ideals and concepts.

Further note to "Republicans": y'all best be replacing the clowns at the top of your (R) establishment. In my estimation, they suck more than the out-of-the-closet communist (D)'s. At least the commies are committed to their effort, and the bastards are accomplishing what they set out to do, unlike the spineless Stupid Party. "Spineless, stupid party..", boy does that hit the nail on the head.  The current House of Representatives is an embarrassment to Conservatism.  I am constantly motivated to apologize to the Citizens of the United States for the House's lack of clarity and energy in defense of our national soul.  This is top level treachery IMO.

Brokered convention? Hmmmm. Romney beats the Halfrican? Hmmmm. Romney's coattails drag a majority of Tea Party candidates to the Senate? Hmmmm. What could possibly go wrong?  Well, if they fall in line behind Romney and pass his desires with gusto, we could be in a world of hurt.  Taking note of his past judicial nominees, it disgusts me to think he and not Obama might be the person to flip the court.  If they stand up to him, we might dodge the bullet.  Frankly, with what we're presented with, a deadlocked federal government should be best.  Then again, Obama will attempt to rule by Executive Order, thumbing his nose at our three branch government model.  And of course the Republicans will be mute.

See ya in the gulag.
  ...he said with 25% humor and 75% real concern.  I hear ya.

1,271 posted on 04/13/2012 10:53:26 PM PDT by DoughtyOne (Okay, now lets see if the RNC, Carl Rove, and Andrew Card can get him elected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 666 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson