[Pravious]

“Maybe you don’t understand. We literally can’t vote for Romney. Our principles and our morals won’t let us do that and live with peace of mind. I just can’t “do that”, period.”

Not voting for Romney is one less vote against Obama. What part of your conscience feels good about helping the re-election of Obama come about?

It’s bad enough to have watched the various factions here attack each of our candidates one-by-one as not ideologically “pure” enough. Now, we’re supposed to sit back and say: “Yeah! Screw Romney! Let’s let Obama win!”

Well MY conscience won’t allow THAT, because that’s the WORST thing that could possibly happen to our country.

Some people here need to stop acting like emotional children just because THEIR guy didn’t win. You know why that didn’t happen? It’s not because the evil GOP-e was stuffing ballot boxes... it’s because a significant amount of people with an “R” next to their name voted for Mitt Romney.

You don’t like it? Well, I don’t like it, either.

But I dislike Barack Obama much, much, MUCH more.

[GenXteacher]

“Some people here need to stop acting like emotional children just because THEIR guy didn’t win. You know why that didn’t happen? It’s not because the evil GOP-e was stuffing ballot boxes... it’s because a significant amount of people with an “R” next to their name voted for Mitt Romney.”

That sounds rather like something Cokie Roberts said after she disagreed with some election results that went rightward. And that BS in VA where only Romney and Ron Paul were left on the ballot was definitely the work of the GOP-e. You Romney supporters are being rather disingenuous.

[GeronL]

You can pick Obama2-R over Obama1-D if you want.

The party ID means squat, as Mittens himself pointed out-he’s barely one anyway.

I cannot vote for a liberal, pro-abortion, pro-govcare, anti-gun candidate, no matter what party.

[LibLieSlayer]

Are you just going to ignore the tactical decision by reince prebieus to keep certain states open primary states? Are you going to overlook certain republican Secretaries of State keeping mitt's competition off the ballot? Are you going to forget the elections where romney actually was crowned the winner but in fact did not win the majority of votes? Iowa Caucus comes to mind. Are you going to overlook the fact that so far in all of the primary votes cast... more REPUBLICANS voted for someone other than mitt?

You have to ignore an awful lot to say that mitt is the winner “fair and square"... he does not have enough delegates to declare himself the winner and there are still many citizens wishing to cast their primary vote and have it heard. mitt hasn't won anything yet. If he does... many of us will not vote for him. The above reasons are just some of why we will not... but there are many more serious reasons that cause us to refuse and take a stand.

LLS