Well that's possible but there will be tremendous pressure for on him to nominate a strict constructionist.
Obama on the other hand will without question nominate the most radical liberal progressive he can possibly find.
So this is a no brainer, nothing to even think about. Romney is the clear choice between the two.
I don't get the feeling you are thinking this way but this idea we'd be better off with four more years of Obama over Romney is just bull headed foolishness. No other way to explain it.
(Yeah, right...from a pro-life perspective, your statement is difficult to prove ...why do I say that? Well, Romney advocated the "right" for parents to give ("donate") their offspring to "research..."...He did this during a Katie Couric interview...December, 2007...You would think that conservatives would have held his feet to the fire for making such an absurd, schizophrenic statement...since he claimed he had undergone a "pro-life conversion" three years prior to that...but, no...hardly anything...and basically NOTHING from the Republican powers-that-be...)
Also, Romney has assumed three separate positions on treating homosexuals as minority-class status...First, he was for it...Then against it...Then he assumed a third position -- to allow states to do that...
Romney is so "all over the board" on so many issues...He cannot be trusted...
It`s just that I have no confidence that he will appoint Conservative Judges. I have more confidence that he will appoint a moderate Republican, to me that is of no value.
Really I am mostly concerned about Pro Life/family values!
I would like to see Romney and Obama state their positions publicly, perhaps in a forum like Rick Warren held with McCain/Obama.
But I do not want it to be with Rick Warren, have little respect for him, perhaps Focus on the Family James Dobson, talking tough questions, not like what phony Warren had....that`s my idea.