Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: lowbridge

The flaw - of course - is that that the person that fired the weapon would most probably not be the person that purchased it. (Those of room temp IQ or above need no further explanation of how that might happen.)

Liberals, of course, cannot understand logic past the first line, so why bother?


4 posted on 04/13/2012 9:41:13 AM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Da Coyote

Liberals, of course, cannot understand logic past the first line, so why bother?

I think each liberal should have a macrostamp on their forheads....idiot liberal


15 posted on 04/13/2012 9:51:32 AM PDT by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Da Coyote

It isn’t about reducing crime. It is about further limiting 2A rights through increased costs, registering ammunition and/or firing pins, etc. They don’t want to reduce crime; they want to take away your guns.


42 posted on 04/13/2012 10:27:24 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Da Coyote

Isn’t the bigger flaw in the plan that no crime has been solved with micro stamping?

Remember the Canadian gun registry program. It was sold as the same. It will solve crimes... Zero where solved. It also quickly grew to a massively expensive program.


43 posted on 04/13/2012 10:27:24 AM PDT by Dutch Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson