Hitler got about 33% of the vote and then in an Obama like fashion ignored the laws, appointed himself supreme leader, and took over agency by agency. He used race baiting as a political technique and blamed all of Germany’s ills on the Wiemar Republic propped up by the Allies. (That is, blamed Democracy). That sounds a lot more like Obama then Romney. Oh, and he also nationalized a lot heavy industry and even bailed out car companies who in turn became nationalized, to save the country, of course. And Hitler and O also seemed to have a great hatred for Churchill. Curious.
NObody questions that Obama is bad, bad news.
If Romney becomes “our” (gag) candidate I will be arguing that Romney is slime but at least he’s not as slimy as Obama.
But Romney is not our candidate, and as long as I have the choice of somebody who is committed to FREEDOM to the point that he would not even consider forcing Catholic hospitals to perform abortions, I have to support the non-tyrant. Why support a tyrant who modeled for Obama the very way he could take over 1/6th of the economy and force a government doctrine onto a religious denomination against their own beliefs?
The R establishment wants everybody to believe that Romney is a done deal. He’s not, and the only way he will be is if people who should know the difference between a primary and a general election betray the very cause they have collected money to support. If I was a Catholic who gave money to NRLC and Susan B Anthony I’d be burning down their phone lines asking for my money back. These groups are jumping the gun, trying to coronate Romney as the candidate when the race is still on and a genuine pro-lifer is still in it.
I told my husband this morning I don’t think my back has any more surface area to field the stabs from people who claim to be on the side of freedom, life, and the US Constitution.