Posted on 04/11/2012 11:10:33 AM PDT by AtlasStalled
You would be correct.
And in the world of today this kind of destruction could happen to almost anyone. The charges do not even have to be real to result in your ruin. A claim, an investigation and pursuit of evidence can be enough to destroy you.
Different than the Zimmerman case but almost anyone can become a target. Basically, if you have anything you need to keep it to yourself. Anybody who exhibits conspicuous well being can become a target for someone who has less and wants to take it away.
The First Thing You KnowGod made the mountains
God made the sky
God made the people
God knows whyHe fixed up the planet
As best as He could
Then in come the people
And gum it up goodThe first thing you know
They civilized the foothills
And everywhere He put hills
The mountains and valley belowThey come along and take 'em
And civilize and make 'em
A place where no civilized
Person would goThe first thing you know
The first thing you knowThey civilize what's pretty
By puttin' up a city
Where nothin' that's
Pretty can growThey muddy up the winter
And civilize it inter
A place too uncivilized
Even for snowThe first thing you know
They civilize left
They civilize right
Till nothing is left
Till nothing is rightThey civilize freedom
Till no one is free
No one except
By coincidence, meThe first thing you know
The boozer's in prison
And the criminal he isn'
And only the rascals have doughWhen I see a parson
I gotta put my arse in
A wagon that follows the tail of a crowThe first thing you know
I pick up and blow!
The first thing you know
One of my favorite songs and a guiding light in my life. lol
No, your ego is evidently more important then truth and justice.
Go play for bragging rights on DU.
You cannot become the aggressor, and them claim 'self-defense' when things go wrong.
Parroting the MSNBC lines here don't work, try again.
Every DA, and prosecutor I know has said this would be the charge. Man 1, reduced sentence.
Then why were the initial charges declined by the local prosecutor?
This is purly political, go swim in your kool aide.
There was a gas station, Mario Brothers, and a car parts enterprise close to that corner, Broadway and Adams. I don’t remember precisely what was there.
At any rate, I used to frequent all three from time to time.
I haven’t seen Burbank Karl around for a while either. Hope all is okay with him.
Yes, things have changed in California, but if they changed once, they can change again.
We’re a nation of 310 million people. If less than 1/60th of that number moved into the state, they could turn things around there.
As Conservatives, we need to fight for the jewels of the nation.
In 2000, California was the fifth leading economic power in the world, behind the U. S., Japan, and a couple of others.
It’s a territory with some of the most diverse terrain on planet earth. Far more of it’s people are bedrock people than most people realize.
Outside of the San Fransisco and Los Angeles metropolitan areas, the state is quite Conservative. Nail the problematic counties down, and we’re back in business. We’d be back to having decent leadership, and on to fixing what ails us.
California is truly a crown jewel of the nation. It’s a shame to surrender it to the people who want it desperately for that very reason.
B U M P
Great one!!
BTTT!
And SSASU (shoot shovel and shut up)
” Good questions. There are lots of good questions...
Why is the FedMob selling guns, grenades, rocket launchers and other military hardware to drug cartels on the sly?
Why did the Pres. and State Dept. support the overthrow of Honduras by a clearly corrupt and treasonous president that was almost unanimously removed from power by legal means of their legislature and supreme court?
Why did no one say a word when 0bama unilaterally took over two major auto manufacturers, appointed new CEOs and stole the holdings of the bond holders giving them to the unions?
When will Boehner finally follow through on his threat to do something about 0bama’s illegal military actions in Libya?
After nearly two years of investigation why hasn’t the DoJ come up with one charge against Sheriff Joe Arpaio?”
You could list 50-100 more horrible things.
The last one? Arpaio is a life long officer (fed and state) and doesn’t break the law. The fed, in desperation, tried to put an agent/monitor(Holder stooge) in with Joe to get something on him, and Joe told the fed “bite me”
It may be you are basing the 'new info' report on this...
...the original title of which was..."Prosecutor to announce new information in Trayvon Martin shooting investigation in 72 hours"
The title was deceptive and has been changed.
There was nothing in the article to back a claim of new info, only this...
"Corey released a brief statement late Tuesday saying she would make an announcement about the case within 72 hours."
Nothing about new information.
There may very well be new info but it was never announced that I've seen.
Probably not.
But that won't stop them from seeing dollar signs, anyway, no matter how they felt. Maybe postings from the 'NO LIMIT NI**A' with his middle finger extended just gave the proud parents warm and fuzzy feelings of familial pride.
I don't pretend to know their hearts.
YMMV.
You are so right and you are wise.
So very true....unfortunately San Diego too ;(
Yes, things have changed in California, but if they changed once, they can change again.
From your keyboard to God's ear my FRiend!
They are writing the law just now:
Willful disregard to accept bashing in of ones skull...
Best Things w/Clint Eastwood
(Paramount hasn't found those yet. Download while you can.)
Thanks, I will do that.
Zimmerman engaged in actions that lead to the shooting, not only did he do so, he did so after repeated advice not to. Lie.
leave his car and try to hunt the kid down Lie.
he decided to take matters into his own hands Lie.
his idiotic actions Lie.
(acting like) an abject idiot. Lie.
he got out of his car and decided to hunt down the kid on his own. Lie.
And the audacity of hope...ooops, the audacity to change....ooops, the audacity to defend ones self against a protected thug.....damn it, minority.
Go to jail, do not collect $200.00 white boy....ooops, white hispanic...no Jew....no....oh crap, I'm so confused.
I’m not sure what type of vehicle you drive, but all mine have mirrors on them that allow you to see down both sides and behind the vehicle all while sitting in the drivers seat.
Remember ... probable cause is a pretty low threshold. Also,I am going off facts I see and read which is absolutely NO substitute for Prosecutorial investigation. In no particular order
1. Armed v. unarmed
2. Police told him not to follow but he did
3. Scream was probably Treyvon
4. Pursuing obviates application of “stand your ground”. He can not avail himself of its protection.
5. Zimmerman seen straddling Treyvon’s body.
6. No evident significant injury to Zimmerman despite claim he was so injured.
7. Girlfriend’s testimony that Treyvon felt he was being followed. Treyvon turning on Martin, esp under FL law, is fine if he felt threatened.
One thing in which I would be VERY interested in would be forensics on bullet trajectory, fingerprints (if Treyvon’s were on weapon) etc.
Please understand that we attorney’s look at this VERY differently from the public at large. Part of my job was to charge a crime if I had probable cause to believe one was committed. This is why Prosecutors and Def attys of all types are being paraded across television and the Internet, almost to a man/woman, saying this is an EASY call. I said from the outset that he should/would be charged with Voluntary and Involuntary Manslaughter. I stand by that.
And I say again (because some people will argue guilt with me) ... this is VERY different from “beyond a reasonable doubt”. I’ll be the first to admit this is, seemingly, not an easy prosecution. But, that doesn’t mean you don’t prosecute it.
Hope that answers some questions. =)
You're right that is the correct answer to the question as I asked it. Let me rephrase it...
After nearly two years of investigation without coming up with one charge why is the DoJ still investigating Sheriff Joe Arpaio?
Yes, there are at least 100 more horrible things I could have listed ... but I would have to type them. I plead a tendency to tendonitis!
not only was it a dumb statement about zimmerman suppsoedly ‘being hte aggressor’ but zimmerman NEVER touched trayvon- Trayvon was the one who committed the CRIMINAL act on Zimmerman FIRST- Following someone is NOT an aCT OF AGGRESSION- AND WE ALSO HAVE EVIDENCE THAT SHOWS THAT ZIMMERMAN WAS NOT INFACT FOLLOWING tRAYVON, BUT HEADED BACK TO HIS CAR. srry cps lock- Zimmerman had EVERY RIGHT to leave his car, to even approach trayvon and confront him - however, trayvon had NO right to CRIMINALLY ASSAULT zimmerman
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.