[Resettozero]

Your dissection is keen and accurate. Everything is circumspect...except for your first and misleading and accusatory judgement: “No, you’re just deluded.”

What if the poster is spot on and you are choosing to miss the point of the fantastical story? What if the point is worthy of being made and the poster is not deluded?

What does that do to your neat dissection that followed?

[aruanan]

What if the poster is spot on and you are choosing to miss the point of the fantastical story? What if the point is worthy of being made and the poster is not deluded?

What does that do to your neat dissection that followed?

Nothing at all, because the point of the fantastical story is one of delusion. Mitt is a BAD choice and offers poor prospects. Obama has been one of the worst presidents and is much more likely than Mitt to continue and exacerbate the current situation. Withholding a vote from Mitt is giving a vote to Obama. Pretending that that outcome is none of one's responsibility and withholding a vote from Mitt is an exercise in godly morality is delusion. It's also a pretty good example of moral masturbation.