[Jim Robinson]

Eff the GOP-e. There’s no way in hell that I will vote for their abortionist, homo rights pushing, gun-grabbing, big government mandate loving socialist healthcare pushing constitution trampler. They’ve gone a RINO too far.

[RetroSexual]

Eff the GOP-e. There’s no way in hell that I will vote for their abortionist, homo rights pushing, gun-grabbing, big government mandate loving socialist healthcare pushing constitution trampler. They’ve gone a RINO too far.

I'm with you so far. Are you thinking "no vote," "write-in," "third party" .. what at the moment seems like the best bet to you?

To me, a vote for the RINO and the Zero is the same thing - except voting for Zero pushes off the cliff sooner, and thus toward recovery sooner.

For me, at the moment, the solution is to leave the Presidential portion of my ballot blank. But I do have some important local races I wouldn't want to miss.

[Bryanw92]

>>There’s no way in hell that I will vote for their abortionist, homo rights pushing, gun-grabbing, big government mandate loving socialist healthcare pushing constitution trampler.

Baraq Hussein Obama is all those things and more.

[PieterCasparzen]

Eff the GOP-e. There’s no way in hell that I will vote for their abortionist, homo rights pushing, gun-grabbing, big government mandate loving socialist healthcare pushing constitution trampler. They’ve gone a RINO too far.

Most of us non-politician citizens that are interested in politics (more and more these days, of course) don't think about elections and governance from a politician's point of view. Understandable because we're not politicians.

A few thoughts, for what they're worth...

a) There is the impending pop of a worldwide government spending and government debt bubble. Since the U.S. government is so large and our economy is so large, it can't be turned on a dime. So deflating the bubble in a controlled fashion would be challenging, if a President AND Congress actually decided on that course of action. Romney is not a "bubble-popper", but would merely attempt to slow down it's expansion. He apparently will do nothing, however, to undo decades of immoral legislation that rigs everything against the individual, i.e., laws that encourage immoral actions against families and the individual while they create enormous legal risks, burdens and barriers to entry for private business enterprises.

b) If the next President is a Republican, the communist/islamofascist elements inside America will make a full-court press to initiate civil unrest in America. Since the radical far left is currently in the White House, violent confrontations between Federal law enforcement and anarchists are counterproductive to the far left's agenda; they make Obama look bad. So demonstrations are allowed to be "ratcheted up" but with the understanding that there will not anything really terrible happening while the far left enjoys the power of the Presidency. If a Republican is in the White House, civil unrest can be deceitfully painted by the left as being justified, i.e., struggling to overthrow "the man", or wall street, "white slaveholders", or whatever other boogie man they select.

c) The C/I elements are allied with the "modernist/atheist" intelligentsia (which includes many wealthy and politically powerful people as well as leaders of the media and education, of course); both of these factions think they are the true leaders of society, i.e., they believe they are uniquely qualified to "run" society and they are very self-important and feel that they do, in essence, "run" society.

d) If the debt bubble breaks under the next President and they are a Republican, all the world's problems would be blamed on Republicans by the media so much so that it would make the media of today seem unbiased. The left, from their positions in education, the press and government would make all the use they can out of economic misery. The far left violent groups would go all out to incite violence, which would be rationalized by the intelligentsia and publicized and championed by the liberal press.

e) To the contrary, if Obama is reelected, continued government debt bubble expansion would hasten the debt bubble burst, and forever brand liberal theories with epic failure.

f) Large publicly-held financial organizations, state and local governments, unions and pension funds would be hit tremendously hard by the bursting of the debt bubble. Unemployment could very well reach a grand scale. People have to eat; individual citizens, therefore, would simply weather the storm, same as in Depression I, by extreme belt-tightening. Moving in together to save on housing, spending little to nothing on clothing, cars, travel or anything but the barest of necessities. Once one's investments are all gone, investment losses cease. Depression II will mostly hurt those who have significant wealth, for there the only truly safe investments would be in those necessity industries. Out of it all, people would be faced, inevitably, with going back to believing in the reality of simple business arithmetic instead of the hacky political and social theories of the over-educated. Given the high state of technology today, and the large number of entrepreneurial leaders in America, there is no need for a complete rebuilding process to be very long or painful, and it would provide a solid mandate for lopping off much of the lethargic and parasitic government machinery. Most importantly, more folks might come to realize that a spiritual revival is a prerequisite for any lasting social, economic and national security revival.

[FreeReign]

They’ve gone a RINO too far.

Good one Jim.

Enough RINOs are enough.

It's the RINO that broke the camel's back.

Spare the rod - spoil the RINO.

RINO me once (twice, three times)shame on you. RINO me four times shame on me.

[ConservativeMind]

I completely understand your position, but I will vote for the lesser of the two evils this election. It is very unlikely to be Newt, so that will be McRomney.

Obama in another term is worse than Romney. If Romney gets in, we can try to have Newt oppose him in 2016.

We didn't get here in one election and we won't get back to where we need to be in one election. Rush calls it, “incrementalism.” It will take decades of strong, methodical push back at all levels of government, every step pushing more conservative. Sadly, Romney looks to be that start.

I agree with your heart on this, though.

[.30Carbine]

They’ve gone a RINO too far.

Such a way with words!

[jpsb]

Bush2 was my "RINO too far."

Welcome to the no party party.

[OneLoyalAmerican]

Greetings Jim Robinson:

Eff the GOP-e...They’ve gone a RINO too far.

Respectfully disagree. We must not let 0bama (Shicklgruber, or whatever his name is) make another SCOTUS appointment. Unless something drastic happens, we're stuck voting for Willard. Genuinely fear 2012 will be the slimiest, most fraud riddled general election ever.

On the other hand, you've made great progress against GOPe, despite Ted Baxter bashing FR from FoxSnooze.

This was the first primary in my lifetime where the GOP candidate wasn't selected before super Tuesday. We started this election with a great lineup of conservative candidates. And despite all the GOPe celebration, not-Romney GOP and not voted still has more delegates than GOPe Myth earned.

At risk of sounding like a Cubs Fan, wait 'til 2016.

Cheers,
OLA