Seems to fit the circumstances and an excellent course for the defense to take if this gets to trial.
If it does not get to trial, I hope everyone is at a personal defcon2 status.
In my opinion the authorities, are weighing the question, "Is it better to placate the racists with a trial?"... "but if the trial does not produce the "desired results", how bad will that be, compared to deciding a no trial backlash based on overwhelming evidence of justifiable self defense"... damned if they do and damned if they don't...
In my opinion the authorities, are weighing the question, "Is it better to placate the racists with a trial?"... "but if the trial does not produce the "desired results", how bad will that be, compared to deciding a no trial backlash based on overwhelming evidence of justifiable self defense"... damned if they do and damned if they don't...
If it does not get to trial, I hope everyone is at a personal defcon2 status.
Standing by at DEFCON 3 for now, with REDCON 3 set. If there's an arrest of Zimmerman, we'll go to REDCON 2.
Defense readiness conditions (DEFCONs) describe progressive alert postures primarily for use between the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the commanders of unified commands. DEFCONs are graduated to match situations of varying military severity, and are numbered 5,4,3,2, and 1 as appropriate. DEFCONs are phased increases in combat readiness. In general terms, these are descriptions of DEFCONs:
DEFCON 5 Normal peacetime readiness
DEFCON 4 Normal, increased intelligence and strengthened security measures
DEFCON 3 Increase in force readiness above normal readiness
DEFCON 2 Further Increase in force readiness, but less than maximum readiness
DEFCON 1 Maximum force readiness.