We need voter ID now or else the RATS will keep stealing elections.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: mandaladon
2 posted on
04/09/2012 4:51:33 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Jimmy Carter Is No Longer The Worst President To Have Served In My Lifetime.)
To: mandaladon
Holder, Obama, and the rest of their commie minions know the ONLY way to win elections is by rigging it with dead voters and illegal aliens. They know they can’t win an election the HONEST way
To: mandaladon
"It's no coincidence that these so-called examples of rampant voter fraud consistently turn out to be manufactured ones," said a department official..." Did the "department official" really think this statement through? If true, it's a tacit admission that Holder was involved...
4 posted on
04/09/2012 4:55:53 PM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: mandaladon
The article is inaccurate.
No tricks were used, nor was the name “Eric Holder” used.
6 posted on
04/09/2012 4:56:51 PM PDT by
ltc8k6
To: mandaladon
We need lots of pressure, right now on the elected. This is BS. If it goes away we get what we deserve.
7 posted on
04/09/2012 4:59:59 PM PDT by
reefdiver
("Let His day's be few And another takes His office")
To: mandaladon
Appointing this terrorist-loving, bribe-rigging, corrupt pardon-arranging, race-baiting hatemonger Attorney General of the United States - now THAT was a stunt.
8 posted on
04/09/2012 5:00:56 PM PDT by
Argus
To: mandaladon
"It's no coincidence that these so-called examples of rampant voter fraud consistently turn out to be manufactured ones," said a department official, who asked not to be identified.What did they manufacture? Seemed a pretty straightforward and useful demonstration of how easy it is to get someone else's ballot. What if the Dems know that certain people are unable to get out to vote? How easy to send goons out to vote in their place.
9 posted on
04/09/2012 5:02:59 PM PDT by
arkady_renko
(I want to believe.)
To: mandaladon
Holder didn’t Vote I Presumme That was clear as he hadn’ted absentee nor signed the sheet
10 posted on
04/09/2012 5:04:48 PM PDT by
philly-d-kidder
(AB-Sheen"The truth is the truth if nobody believes it,a lie is still a lie, everybody believes it")
To: mandaladon
Holder hisself is a cunning stunt.
11 posted on
04/09/2012 5:05:35 PM PDT by
TigersEye
(Life is about choices. Your choices. Make good ones.)
To: mandaladon
It's no big deal. Obama was the only choice on that primary ballot.
Now go pay your taxes. I need a vacation to the Bahamas. :)
12 posted on
04/09/2012 5:07:49 PM PDT by
Tzimisce
(THIS SUCKS)
To: mandaladon
Wouldn't it be nice if we had a chance to elect a president that would invoke several independent councils to investigate holder and the obama administration? If the gop/e get their way... it will NEVER happen. Either way the election goes... it appears the criminal anti American commies will get away with everything. obama and his administration are so powerful and control the gop/e so firmly that they now operate in your face with their treason and they dare anyone to even try to stop them.
The gsa fiasco and that scandal is another "in the face" of the right... and as Rush said today... it was done for exactly that reason. “Screw you America... we can do anything without consequence... and we ARE”!
LLS
13 posted on
04/09/2012 5:20:45 PM PDT by
LibLieSlayer
(WOLVERINES! (accept only the original))
To: mandaladon
Eric the Lightweight...
********
16 posted on
04/09/2012 5:34:02 PM PDT by
Wings-n-Wind
(The main things are the plain things!)
To: mandaladon; ExTexasRedhead; ml/nj; melancholy; SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; ...
We need voter ID now or else the RATS will keep stealing elections.Yes, voter ID will help get rid of some of the fraud, but the 'Rats and their allies might get more creative in their methods. Once basic honesty and integrity are lost, free and fair elections are very difficult to achieve.
Question to the RNC: Do you have any specific plans to counteract the opposition's fraud tactics in this November's elections?
To: mandaladon
So how else would one prove there’s fraud when the DOJ won’t investigate? And that includes W’s DOJ.
19 posted on
04/09/2012 5:49:08 PM PDT by
Terry Mross
("It happened. And we let it happen." - Peter Griffin, Family Guy)
To: mandaladon
when in reality, huge numbers of people who wanted to game the voting system would have to take part in a coordinated scheme to make even a small impact.
Which is not only inaccurate in the first part, it misses the point completely in the second.
First, how many precincts can 5-10 people "hit" in a single election day? That's not a huge number of people, by any stretch of the imagination. But even in those limited numbers they can cover a LOT of ground. I remember working campaigns where I was responsible for running additional materials to volunteers on the ground in the precincts, running circuits that would allow me to hit several dozen over the course of a few hours.
Second, there's the old and very true saying that "they can't cheat if it isn't close". How much did Al Franken win by again? How about George Bush in Florida? There are LOTS of races every year - important ones that determine things like the implementation of Socialized Medicine - where fraud to the tune of a couple/few hundred votes really matters.
Additionally, vote fraud doesn't exist all by itself, and probably doesn't swing lots of elections all by itself. But as part of a more comprehensive plan to win elections by any means necessary? Such as when used in conjunction with legal challenges aimed at throwing out legitimate ballots, or with ballot box stuffing by corrupt poll workers?
It seems to me that the problem with going after corrupt election practices on an individual basis allows for a divide-and-conquer response from the Dems. On their own, sure, most corruption doesn't make a heck of a lot of difference except in a few elections. But working together is another matter entirely.
To: mandaladon
James O’Keefe is a GENIUS!
Holder, you’ve been punked.
21 posted on
04/09/2012 6:00:15 PM PDT by
killermosquito
(Buffalo, Detroit (and eventually France) is what you get when liberalism runs its course.)
To: mandaladon
“”The volunteer finds Holder’s ballot and offers it to the man””
I’ve voted in three different states in my voting years and have never seen a ballot with my name on it. Every report on this refers to a ballot in Holder’s name. Do they do things differently in DC?
To: mandaladon
***without voter ID laws, anyone can vote under anyone else’s name ***
How true! I remember reading of an election in the 1860s California. Various names were on the roles and into town came some Indians in breachclouts. They went into the polling station and declared they were..”O’Malley”. “Jones”
and various other Anglo names. They then made their mark on the ballot in the proper place for the Democrat candidate to win.
To: mandaladon
Holder serving as AG is a stunt.
26 posted on
04/09/2012 6:41:28 PM PDT by
doug from upland
(Just in case, it has been reserved: www.TheBitchIsBack2012.com)
To: mandaladon
It’s matters like this that make me wish FR allowed a certain amount of profanity so I could clearly state what I think of Mr. Holder and his Justice Department.
27 posted on
04/09/2012 6:49:34 PM PDT by
Oldeconomybuyer
(The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson