Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arpaio: GOP Candidates 'Hiding' From Eligibility
WND ^ | 08 April 2012 | Drew Zahn

Posted on 04/09/2012 1:06:09 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome

Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio told a radio host today he’s met with Republicans – including every one of the GOP presidential candidates – and has come to the conclusion they’re as guilty as Democrats of “hiding” questions about Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president.

As WND reported, Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse conducted an extensive examination of documents released by the White House last April purported to be Obama’s original, long-form birth certificate and Selective Service registration card, only to conclude there is probable cause the documents are actually forgeries.

Yet despite his findings, Arpaio told “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio” on New York’s WABC Radio that media and politicians alike are afraid to touch the issue.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: corruption; joearpaio; naturalborncitizen; obama; sheriffjoe; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last
Audio of the interview is also available at the source.
1 posted on 04/09/2012 1:06:12 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Yeah they are. But you know what I’m thinking? My thought on this is not that they won’t ever take it up, it’s that they know they only have one chance if they do.

If Newt, Rick or Mitt ever take up the eligibility issue they will have to be able to prove, immediately, unquestionably, and absolutely that they have the goods. If they don’t they will be massacred by the media (rhetorically speaking).

It would also be a full declaration of war against the Obama administration and could possibly convince him that his only chance to avoid prison is to assume supreme power and govern directly. And if that means whipping up race riots, declaring martial law, ordering the Supreme Court into recess, or even locking them up, he’ll do it.

At that stage he would have nothing to lose.

Bearing that in mind, it’s very possible they might be waiting for exactly the right moment and forum to play that card. If that’s the case, it’s probably a smart move.

Of course, they might also be chicken.


2 posted on 04/09/2012 1:17:23 AM PDT by Ronin (Sarah.... We really need you now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome; LucyT
"Klein asked Arpaio if he’d heard from Republicans since the announcement of the investigation’s findings.

“I haven’t heard from any,” Arpaio said, “especially the congressional delegation from Arizona.”

Sheriff Joe calling out the coward pols Ping.

3 posted on 04/09/2012 1:19:10 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
Of course, they might also be chicken.

If they refuse to broach this issue, then they themselves are criminal, and we have enough of those already.

4 posted on 04/09/2012 1:22:23 AM PDT by itsahoot (Tag lines are a waste of bandwidth, as are most of my comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
"It would also be a full declaration of war against the Obama administration and could possibly convince him that his only chance to avoid prison is to assume supreme power and govern directly. And if that means whipping up race riots, declaring martial law, ordering the Supreme Court into recess, or even locking them up, he’ll do it."

In case you hadn't noticed, he's kinda gearing up for that already. The Supreme Court demand/order will probably come after they repudiate Obamacare, and right before the second run on the banks/market. I don't think we're going to get out of this pResidency without some MAJOR Stow High In Transit going down. All it takes is the right pretext.

" You never want a serious crisis to go to waste."
Rahm "Bath House" Emanuel

5 posted on 04/09/2012 1:37:26 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Who is afraid of the Islamofascist?

Sounds like a good marching chant to me.


6 posted on 04/09/2012 1:55:39 AM PDT by Eye of Unk (Liberals need not reply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

I’m afraid you’re right.


7 posted on 04/09/2012 2:18:31 AM PDT by Ronin (Sarah.... We really need you now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
My thought on this is not that they won’t ever take it up, it’s that they know they only have one chance if they do.

Yes, but the truth has a way of sticking around. The voters know little about this man, and are curious to know.

One thing that bothers me about Romney is the apparent lack of statesmanship in the man, besides being wishy washy. Our country is on a road to nowhere right now.

Joe got it right -- cowards, all!

8 posted on 04/09/2012 2:39:11 AM PDT by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Good morning all,

“When will it come to a head?”

http://theintelhub.com/2012/04/08/doj-distraction-in-conjunction-with-mainstream-media-launched-against-sheriff-arpaio/


9 posted on 04/09/2012 2:46:04 AM PDT by sueQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

The Republican Party and all of our so called Conservative talk show and TV hosts are damn cowards, leaving Sheriff Joe out on a limb like this.

I say third party with Joe for President.

What’s to lose?


10 posted on 04/09/2012 3:22:34 AM PDT by wistful
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: olezip
"Our country is on a road to nowhere right now.

Obligatory. There's a surprising amount of the lyrics that could be ascribed to the USA, if personified.

And if our Republic falls, there's not much in the way of places to go in the world to outrun the metastasizing global tyranny.

11 posted on 04/09/2012 3:43:01 AM PDT by Flotsam_Jetsome (If not you, who? If not now, when?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ronin
The longer this goes on the worse the final result will be. Delay only makes extricating ourselves from the quicksand that much more difficult. Real problems this this monster will never just go away. The current favorite storyline told by the candidates is “Let's not spend time on his eligibility, lets address his policies.” Do they not they know how stupid that sounds. What good is it to spend time addressing policies that are as illegitimate as the guy who issued them?
12 posted on 04/09/2012 3:43:24 AM PDT by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Joe Arpaio is right there! He says what everybody knows. Nobody will uphold the Constitution.


13 posted on 04/09/2012 3:58:34 AM PDT by maxwellsmart_agent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wistful
"The Republican Party and all of our so called Conservative talk show and TV hosts are damn cowards, leaving Sheriff Joe out on a limb like this. I say third party with Joe for President."

Arpaio-Lakin 2012

14 posted on 04/09/2012 4:04:53 AM PDT by Godebert (NO PERSON EXCEPT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
Bush's Fault.

No really.

He never should have surrendered the office to a FOREIGNER!

15 posted on 04/09/2012 4:05:29 AM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

My money is on “chicken.”.


16 posted on 04/09/2012 4:22:08 AM PDT by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ronin

“At that stage he would have nothing to lose.”

At that stage, he WILL lose.


17 posted on 04/09/2012 4:23:19 AM PDT by Fireone (Palin/West, the dream team! (did I mention FUBO?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

Of COURSE they are scared to death to ask that question.

Anyone who even dares to bring this up is attacked from all quarters in the media, branded a RACIST, a kook, a nutjob, etc.

They are the subject of Top 10 lists on LEterman, and skits on Saturday Night Live.

The Dems sick the IRS and justice on you, like they are doing to Arapio. Lots of people don’t dare to mention this.


18 posted on 04/09/2012 4:37:03 AM PDT by tcrlaf (Election 2012: THE RAPTURE OF THE DEMOCRATS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome

I’m linking this to my Facebook, along with the press conference.

I try to keep Facebook non-political, but liberals are firing shots routinely on Facebook.

The truth needs to come out. If you vote Obama, fine, but you’re voting for a fraud. It is what it is.


19 posted on 04/09/2012 4:38:34 AM PDT by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flotsam_Jetsome
It's hard to believe with all the resources available to Obama that he would come up with such an amateur creation as he did with this birth certificate:

1. Back in 1961 people of color were called ‘Negroes’. So how can the Obama birth certificate state he is ‘African-American’ when the term wasn't even used at that time?

2. The birth certificate that the White House released lists Obama’s birth as August 4, 1961. It also lists Barack Hussein Obama as his father. No big deal, right? At the time of Obama’s birth, it also shows that his father is age 25 years old and that Obama’s father was born in “Kenya, East Africa”. This wouldn't seem like anything of concern, except the fact that Kenya did not even exist until 1963, two whole years after Obama’s birth and 27 years after his father's birth. How could Obama’s father have been born in a country that did not yet exist? Up and until Kenya was formed in 1963, it was known as the “British East Africa Protectorate”. Wikipedia about this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenya_Colony

3. On the birth certificate released by the White House, the listed place of birth is “Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital”. This cannot be, because the hospital(s) in question in 1961 were called “KauiKeolani Children's Hospital” and “Kapi’olani Maternity Home”, respectively. The name did not change to Kapi’olani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital until 1978, when these two hospitals merged. How can this particular name of the hospital be on a birth certificate dated 1961 if this name had not yet been applied to it until 1978?

Obama either doesn't know or he doesn't care that we aren't all as shockingly ignorant as his Democrat constituency.

20 posted on 04/09/2012 4:43:43 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-54 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson