Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: butterdezillion

I see you managed to miss the path from the problem to the most immediate solution.


15 posted on 04/07/2012 8:21:33 AM PDT by G Larry (We are NOT obliged to carry the snake in our pocket and then dismiss the bites as natural behavior.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: G Larry

You missed what I was saying. Exposing the thugocracy of this regime (seen most clearly in their handling of the eligibility issue) will turn against him even the people who support his policies.

Sure, we can talk about his policies. If our own candidate is Mitt Romney, there won’t be a whole lot of difference between Obama’s policies and his opponents’ though... To be truthful, the major reason I would give to CONSERVATIVES to vote for Romney (if it comes to that - and I pray every day that it doesn’t) is the lawlessness/thugocracy of Obama (although the R establishment is clearly lawless as well).

So basically what I’m saying is that the thugocracy we’ve seen is the way to get both conservatives and liberals to vote against Obama, regardless of what pitiful candidate the R’s put forward in their effort to steal defeat from the jaws of victory. Because policy-wise, if Romney is our candidate, we don’t have a leg to stand on. The real issue is existential: Do we continue to exist as a free people under the rule of law? I believe we could do that under Romney but definitely not under Obama. And that is an issue that EVERY ideology (except the critical race people) should be able to comprehend and rally for.


18 posted on 04/07/2012 8:31:43 AM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson