This is insane, just about every case before a jury is conjecture and circumstantial. Zimmerman is innocent until proven otherwise. There is circumstantial and physical evidence, plenty of it that points to his innocence. None of it points to his guilt. If it went to a court of law with no new evidence (as it stands now), Zimmerman would walk, no if ands or buts. Everything presented points to his innocence.
Following martin does not point to zimmerman's innocence. Nobody has come forward to say that he saw zimmerman returning to his truck.
And, if anything that we do know points to innocence, it is martin running away from zimmerman.
I'm not saying and have not said that I know who is innocent or guilty...I don't. But I do know that there is no actual evidence or eyewitness statement that says martin attacked zimmerman. That whole theory is based strictly on the reported fact that Zimmerman was losing the fight.
It used to be that conservatives prided ourselves on seeking the truth no matter how ugly it might be. That concept has gone out the window here on this.