Replies

Nonsense. Your base assumption, that zimmerman is the victim, cannot be proven.

Or if you think it has been proven just because he, the shooter says so, then I guess that McDonald's worker in MD really won the mega-millions --- after all, she said she did. And, I am not 'trying to prove zimmerman a liar' at all. I am making the point that without any neutral corrobaration nobody knows what happened - not you, not al sharpton - nobody.

The evidence supports Zimmerman’s story or he would have been arrested on the spot. Again, physical evidence of a broken nose, bloody head and grass stains point to self defense. An eyewitness stated that he seen Zimmerman’s head being pounded into the ground. Voice stress analysis, screams for help, no indication of racial profiling, the person that was shot was bad news... Druggie, abusive towards females classmates (his tweets are disgusting), took a swing at a bus driver, wearing a hood and walking around buildings, tats, gold teeth, having stolen property, suspensions, etc... Yet, Zimmerman is guilty until proven innocent. That is nuts!

Nonsense. Your base assumption, that zimmerman is the victim, cannot be proven.

Aside from Zimmermans's reported account, there is one other piece of evidence that can be weighed. According to Zimmerman's conversation with the police dispatcher, Martin broke contact. Zimmerman remarked that he took off running and he couldn't see him any more. Why didn't Martin continue to the residence where he was staying? It was only half a block away in a direction that would be away from Zimmerman. Why either turn back or loop around the block to come into contact with Zimmerman again? Whether Zimmerman was returning to his truck or was still walking around, it looks like the choice to make contact again was Martin's. Why would Martin do that unless he wanted to confront Zimmerman? It makes Zimmerman's account of Martin attacking him more plausible.

Nonsense. Your base assumption, that zimmerman is the victim, cannot be proven.

Or if you think it has been proven just because he, the shooter says so, then I guess that McDonald's worker in MD really won the mega-millions --- after all, she said she did. And, I am not 'trying to prove zimmerman a liar' at all. I am making the point that without any neutral corrobaration nobody knows what happened - not you, not al sharpton - nobody.

And that my friend remains the elephant sitting in the room

All these Zimmerman supporters want to accept his version of events at face value while knowing that without the other side, Martin's side, you only have one side of the of this confrontation. And we all know that Zimmerman is not going to present himself in a negative light that would result in him being arrested for murder

Martin's side of the story died the night Zimmerman shot him

And we may never know what Zimmerman did to provoke the confrontation. What we DO know, without dispute is that Zimmerman took it upon himself to leave his vehicle and that set in motion a chain of events that led to a killing.

Just cuz I took a nice Easter break, I am accused of avoiding threads about justice for Trayvon and/or Zimmerman. Alice knows that I haven’t been on the internet. I’m a low usage internet user - freepers are rude and crude quite often but they are about as scary Willy Wonka.