[chessplayer]

In other words, the Supreme Court should not even have heard this case, or any other case, much less render judgement on it.

[SkyDancer]

Mmmm, no. The courts decide whether or not some law is constitutional not the law makers such as congress. Mr. Holder needs a course on Constitutional law as well as Obamalamadingdong.

[QT3.14]

“One of the highly developed talents of President Barack Obama is the ability to say things that are demonstrably false, and make them sound not only plausible but inspiring.”

 Sowell

[TexasFreeper2009]

hey, it worked with his birth certificate! I guess he just figured they would just take his word for it with this too!

[shibumi]

"Carney (AKA Baghdad Bob) - "President Obama knows the law."

Hell. He doesn't even know (for sure) who his daddy is.

I'm sorry - lost my mind just for a moment. Should be: "He don't know fo sho who his daddy be."

[Diogenesis]

Mr. Holder arms terrorists and has burned
American children alive.

Of what need has he, or his racist-terrorist DOJ,
ever had for SCOTUS, truth, justice, or the American way.

[EyeGuy]

And intelligent citizens are to presume that the Affirmative Action, US Attorney General, is an unabashed, in-your face, Commie Racist.

[EagleUSA]

Remember these radical leftist utopian hacks live in a false world where right and wrong are defined by their radical agenda, not what is right for America and its laws.

Courts could presume laws to be Constitutional, if we had honest, law and Constitution abiding people creating them. But we don’t— we have Obama and Holder, et al.

So that removes that assumption.

[Chode]

i guess that means laws against illegal immigration and defense of marriage laws are okydoky then too...

[dennisw]

FOAD Holder lying sack o sheit.... you will be flushed down the toilet on November 6th 2012 along with your patron Hussein Obama

[doc1019]

It is my understanding that our judicial systems must assume that all laws are constitutional until challenged by someone with standing. Otherwise every law passed would have to pass through the judicial system before becoming accepted law.

[USNBandit]

In Texas tonight there is an Assistant U.S. Attorney thinking “Why me?!”

[QT3.14]

Forgot to add this little gem:

"Fathom the hypocrisy of a Government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured.......

…. But not everyone must prove they are a citizen."

 Ben Stein

[mo]

He and his boss are basically daring We th e People to do something about it.

[Billthedrill]

Uh, “presumptively constitutional” is sort of beside the point when the law in question is under active consideration by the Supreme Court. We’re past presumption at that point.

[Noob1999]

...............................now in his third day of trying to explain how a constitutional law professor could tell the country on Monday that striking down the mandate would be “unprecedented.” .............................

???????A Constitutional Law Professor???? WTF

How about a sometimes substitute law lecturer who lost his license to practice law in his home state!!!

[matt1234]

I would presume a 2,700-page law is not only unconstitutional but also tyranical.

[Secret Agent Man]

I’d give holder contempt of court and lock him up until he wrote a correct letter and an apology. Murderer cell block.

[skinkinthegrass]

!

[FedsRStealingOurCountryFromUs]

This isn’t even ignorance on behalf of 0bama and Holder.. They both KNOW that the SCOTUS exists to judge the Constitutionality of Laws. They KNOW that. What they also know is that the SCOTUS stands IN THE WAY of 0bama’s plans for a Dictatorial regime. ADMITTING this is something 0bama and Holder would never do, so they continue with the ‘back and forth’ legal word play as a diversion.

[ConorMacNessa]

Bullshit, Mr. Attorney General!

The scope of the Supreme Court's purview on judicial review was first set forth over two hundred years ago in Marbury v. Madison, and that purview has expanded inexorably and incrementally ever since. It is precisely the broad review power of the Supreme Court that has effectuated many of the goals of the Civil Rights movement, the effectuation of which have resulted in your appointment to the high office you now hold.

Think about your oath of office, sir, and that of the man to whom you are charged with providing legal counsel. As it stands at this point, you have been weighed in the balance and found wanting. You will have to answer not only to the people of the United States, but to that Great Lawgiver whose writ binds us all.



Nos genuflectitur ad non princeps sed Princeps Pacem!

Listen, O isles, unto me; and hearken, ye people, from far; The LORD hath called me from the womb; from the bowels of my mother hath he made mention of my name. (Isaiah 49:1 KJV)