Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mitt will do fine
Charleston (WV) Daily Mail ^ | April 5, 2012 | Don Surber

Posted on 04/05/2012 12:05:13 PM PDT by Mustang Driver

The press is circulating Republican-insiders stories again, this time saying Mr. Electable is unelectable.

Don’t buy the latest spin from Democrats. Conservatives should stay calm, cool and collected.

Mitt Romney is the most presidential of Republican nominees since 1988. He looks the part, he acts the part and lives the part. He has worked his way up and made it on his own even though his father was a prominent businessman and successful governor. He is the grown-up in the room whose blandness is a strikingly attractive alternative to the All Trauma Obama presidency. Over the years he has taken progressively more responsible positions — from head of the Mormon mission in France to CEO of Bain Capital — that have built his self-confidence and the trust of others. When people talk about the Republican establishment, they are really talking about the successful people who will make up his government. This is about running a government.

President John McCain? Come on. What were we thinking? OK, the bench was thin. President Bush forgot to develop an heir.

Mitt Romney’s blandness is a plus because he exudes grace under pressure. He gets flustered. But he grins and bears it. This will serve him well in a very ugly campaign, perhaps the ugliest since 1800. We know after 4 years of watching President Obama that he is extremely vulnerable under pressure. He cracks. His temper tantrum against the Supreme Court showed how intellectually empty he is. My goodness, it is unprecedented to have justices turn down a law? Talk about acting stupidly. The pressure must be applied carefully and consistently.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.dailymail.com ...


TOPICS: Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012endorsements; endorsements; mitt; romney; romney2012; romneysucks
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last
To: donna

I do remember 1994. I’m not reading the liberal media. I wasn’t all that happy about voting for Mitt even then. He was too wishy washy. It was a conservative year in which the republican governor in MA won with 70% of the vote. But Mitt wanted nothing to do with the conservatives and was beaten.

Unfortunately, Mitt’s being pushed on us. I won’t vote for him but I hope he wins over Obama. The only thing for us to do once he’s nominated is work to elect as conservative a congress as possible. He can’t sign liberal bills if they never get to him. He’ll have to be pulled to the right whether he likes it or not. He’s a go along to get along type. As governor, he signed liberal bills and appointed democrats. As president, let’s force him to sign conservative bills and appoint conservatives.

I don’t like the hand we’ve been dealt but the powers that be have pulled all the stops. But we’ve learned their tricks.


121 posted on 04/05/2012 5:58:38 PM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
Unfortunately, Mitt’s being pushed on us. I won’t vote for him but I hope he wins over Obama. The only thing for us to do once he’s nominated is work to elect as conservative a congress as possible. He can’t sign liberal bills if they never get to him. He’ll have to be pulled to the right whether he likes it or not. He’s a go along to get along type. As governor, he signed liberal bills and appointed democrats. As president, let’s force him to sign conservative bills and appoint conservatives.

This is very dangerous thinking, because there aren't enough actual Conservative members of Congress to stop Willard and his supporters.

The Democrats and liberal Republicans make up a large amount of Congress, and they will most definitely pass the kinds of bills that Willard will sign off on, and he will push things that they will sign off on. In some ways, he's much worse than Obama, because he'll have both Republicans and Democrats supporting his liberal notions.
122 posted on 04/05/2012 6:09:17 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706; Jim Noble; All
I won’t vote for him but I hope he wins over Obama.

Watch out what you wish for.

If it's O vs R, my vote -- my ONLY REAL TOOL in the system, goes third-party with hopes Obama squeaks past on a tiny plurality, as a weak, bitterly opposed figure -- or BETTER, that an alternative 3rd party candidate chuck "conventional wisdom" and TAKE A CHANCE, because there are probably going to be more than usual "protest" votes going ABOOR in any case. Risk is the price you pay for opportunity.

As long as we stay a righteous nation, God may smile on us. When we have people who know better voting for an agent of bad government and moral malaise like Romney, because they were so afraid of Obama, and their bad guy wins ....? Making a deal with the devil is loser territory.

I'll pass that deal. I hope America passes that deal -- maybe then God will smile and work a miracle. But as long as people who know better are busy empowering a guy who's done what Romney's done, God's gotta be just shaking His head in disappointment.

123 posted on 04/05/2012 6:22:56 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr; All
This is very dangerous thinking, because there aren't enough actual Conservative members of Congress to stop Willard and his supporters. The Democrats and liberal Republicans make up a large amount of Congress, and they will most definitely pass the kinds of bills that Willard will sign off on, and he will push things that they will sign off on. In some ways, he's much worse than Obama, because he'll have both Republicans and Democrats supporting his liberal notions.

A point well worth heeding.

124 posted on 04/05/2012 6:25:33 PM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706
There has been an increased interest in the Constitution and constitutional government. I’m writing a book on the subject myself which will, I hope, add to this. I think the people have awoken and will work to thwart further encroachments on their liberty. I see similarities to the 1760’s when the people started to get a sense of the conspiracy against them. We’re learing their tricks.

So, you didn't mean the above after all?

I was talking about the 1994 Republican Revolution lead by Newt, not anything to do with Mitt. Never mind.

125 posted on 04/05/2012 7:05:01 PM PDT by donna (Republicans won't change their ways until conservatives draw the line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Finny
Romney in the White House, the product of fear, panic, and desperation, would be the the agent that brought the Republican party to surrender to statism and liberalism

Truer words were never spoken. People like Romney let liberals and Progs (neo-Stalinists) continue their lie that history is a constant ratcheting to the Left, that all human "progress" leads to Stalinism.

126 posted on 04/05/2012 7:41:16 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
Oh, I am sure that our side is much more determined to prevent another 2008 McCain sleep fest. You can bet that we will come out swinging and countering every bit or propaganda Obama can sling.

Only if our side stops Romney and puts a real conservative at the helm.

Otherwise ...... bug, meet windshield.

127 posted on 04/05/2012 7:44:02 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
This is very dangerous thinking, because there aren't enough actual Conservative members of Congress to stop Willard and his supporters.

This is very true. As you know, we in Texas (other FReepers may not know) have a 2:1 GOP majority in the Texas house of representatives, and we have a GOP majority in the state senate. Nevertheless, the speaker of the Texas house is a liberal RiNO from San Antonio who was elected and re-elected by a straight-line vote of the Democrats and a fraction of the nominal Republicans -- he is, in essence, a Democratic speaker, except that he gives insurance companies and banks what they want.

This is what a Romney presidency would play out as, almost zig for zig and zag for zag. It was what McLame was trying to put together with his infamous "maverick" senatorial faction, the Gang of 14. They tried to seize power by creating a swing bloc that would force numerous interest groups and both parties to come grovelling to them.

128 posted on 04/05/2012 7:53:17 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

“I don’t like the hand we’ve been dealt but the powers that be have pulled all the stops. But we’ve learned their tricks.”

And also, they’ve had to expose themselves somewhat this cycle- massive efforts to defeat the conservatives tend to do that.


129 posted on 04/05/2012 7:56:49 PM PDT by GenXteacher (He that hath no stomach for this fight, let him depart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Mustang Driver
(Article) Mitt Romney’s blandness is a plus because he exudes grace under pressure. He gets flustered. But he grins and bears it. This will serve him well in a very ugly campaign

LOL -- yeah, sure. Keep dreaming, Mittbots.

130 posted on 04/05/2012 7:59:23 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lauren BaRecall

“SURVIVED EISENHOWER??????
All we had was one big fat post war boom, and all the illegals went home!”

Well, FWIW, Mitt’s a fan of Eisenhower.
Yeah, we could use a boom right about now.


131 posted on 04/05/2012 8:30:46 PM PDT by WOSG (Anyone But Obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: PSYCHO-FREEP
I agree. If he had run a very good campaign instead of an abortion, McCain might have won in 2008. He was ahead at several points, but his treasonous staff and his own stupidity betrayed him time and again. He lost the election when he "suspended" his campaign and looked like a senile idiot.

Romney is no great conservative, to be sure; but he will be a far stronger a candidate than McCain ever was.

Two factors that are under estimated: One, the Mormon Church is about as rich as the Catholic church, and that is about as wealthy as it gets. Money will not be a limiting factor despite Obama's foreign billion dollars.

Two, if he unleashes his SuperPac from Hell to do to Obama what they did to Newt, we will all need a fallout shelter before it's over.

Yeah, I'm voting for whomever runs against the Usurper, including Romney. Those who claim they can see no difference between Romney and Obama are willfully blind, out of juvenile ignorance. "There are none so blind as those who will not see."

132 posted on 04/05/2012 9:34:43 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Why should I remain calm?

You should remain calm because all your hysterical huffing and puffing will make not a whit of difference. Why waste your energy on nothing.

133 posted on 04/05/2012 9:43:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jersey117
I just don’t understand conservatives bashing success

FR has a lot of A-H bigots and other losers who aren't anything useful but just think they are conservative.

134 posted on 04/05/2012 9:50:43 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

Romney will absolutely NOT GET my vote either. NOT NO BUT HELL
NO!!!! Congress and senate are my main concern at this point GOP-E
can NOT expect me to fall in line any longer I WILL NOT DO IT AGAIN,!!!


135 posted on 04/05/2012 10:03:21 PM PDT by Kit cat (OBummer must go)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: duffee
I’m sensitive to his lack of Conservatism and if you notice he doesn’t seriously even try to reachout to them.

As Blacks might say, "I'm sensitive to republicans' lack of interest in my issues and if you notice, they don't even try to reach out to us." The Nixon solution and many Freeper's was and has been till today, "They won't vote for me anyway so F* them."

It worked, sort of. Romney may be saying, "you won't vote for me anyway so F* you, "conservatives."

Get it children?

136 posted on 04/05/2012 10:11:00 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand
Do you know about Romney and his inheritance from his father?
137 posted on 04/05/2012 10:18:55 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
FWIW,the fifties under Eisenhower were probably the apex of American prosperity and cultural harmony until the Reagan restoration in the '80's.

I grew up in the fifties and would give anything if my kids could have had that experience.

138 posted on 04/05/2012 10:24:14 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Gatún(CraigIsaMangoTreeLawyer)

Emerich Vattel does not make US laws.


139 posted on 04/05/2012 10:33:06 PM PDT by truth_seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hinckley buzzard
"There are none so blind as those who will not see."

Projection, FRiend.

140 posted on 04/06/2012 12:46:54 AM PDT by Finny ("Raise hell. Vote smart." -- Ted Nugent (By the way, Ted, voting for Romney is voting stupid.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson